SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Jamila Khatun – Appellant
Versus
Board of Councillors of Dhuliyan Municipality – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.
1. Writ petition has been instituted, inter alia, challenging Memo No. 3049(19)/Dhuliyan Municipality dated 10th March, 2012 whereby the Chairman of Dhuliyan Municipality (hereinafter referred to as “said Municipality”) communicated to the Councillors to reallocate Sishu Siksha Kendras (hereinafter referred to as “SSK”) in a manner which would enable the authorities to constitute two SSKs in each ward. The said Municipality was having 19 wards and as per the said Memo dated 10th March, 2012 the said Municipality was required to establish total 38 SSKs for 19 wards having two SSKs in each ward. Every SSK would have two Siksha Sahayikas. The said Memo dated 10th March, 2012 is at pages 84 and 85 (Annexure P-9) of the writ petition.
2. Mr. Milon Bhattacharyya, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that engagement letters were issued on 1st February, 2010 to the petitioners for a period of one year and such engagement was renewable. It is the case of the petitioners that engagement letters were issued in terms of Government Scheme issued vide Memo dated 30th May, 2000. It is further contended that as per the said scheme dated 30
Pomal Kanji Govindji And Others vs. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit And Others
Raj Balam Prasad & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Umadevi (3) & Ors.
State of Bihar and Ors. vs. Bihar M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh & Ors.
State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. vs. K. Shyam Sunder & Ors.
Yogesh Mahajan vs. Prof. R.C. Deka, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The court established that procedural compliance with government schemes is essential for valid engagement in public service roles.
The withdrawal of engagement must follow the proper procedure as outlined in the relevant government order, and the principle of res-judicata applies to writ petitions.
Estoppel principle applies to prevent authorities from disengaging an appointed individual based on erroneous internal assessments, unless fraud or misrepresentation is proven.
Authorities cannot disengage an employee based on their own errors during selection; principles of estoppel and approbation/reprobation apply.
Selection as Shiksha Mitra does not confer automatic right to appointment post a government ban on appointments, reaffirming the role of state policy in employment matters.
Aptitude test qualified candidates selected for unaided school assistant teacher posts with specified pay scale cannot be appointed on honorarium; entitled to regular pay from original date, coerced ....
Point in Issue :Whether declaration of petitioner as disqualified to continue as member and consequently President of Panchayat is valid and sustainable.
The court affirmed that previous employment claimed by a Swechhasevi Sikshya Sahayak was invalid due to prior judicial orders deeming the recruitment process null and void, thus rejecting claims for ....
The court upheld the legality of the petitioner's engagement based on prior approvals despite subsequent policy changes, reaffirming the principle of non-retrospective application of administrative d....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.