IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.
IN THE MATTER OF :
Nabarun Debnath & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.A. No. 27518 of 2022
Decided On : 14-06-2024
Pay - Personal Assistant - West Bengal Act (XIX) of 1997 - The court interpreted the provisions regarding grade pay and recruitment errors, concluding that the petitioners were not entitled to the higher grade pay due to administrative error, which was rectified as a fait accompli.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, appointed as Personal Assistants at NSOU, challenged a memorandum that revised their grade pay from Rs.4,600 to Rs.4,400, claiming it was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reduction in grade pay was based on an administrative error and that the petitioners were not entitled to the higher grade pay as it was not applicable to their direct recruitment.
Issues: Whether the revision of grade pay from Rs.4,600 to Rs.4,400 was arbitrary and violated the principles of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that an administrative error in the recruitment process does not confer rights to the employees, and the rectification of such errors is permissible.
Result: The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the memorandum dated 27.07.2022.
JUDGMENT :
Subhendu Samanta, J.
1. Present petitioners are permanent staff of Netaji Subhas Open University (hereinafter referred as NSOU). Both of them were appointed by the process of direct recruitment at the post of Personal Assistant duly advertised through memorandum dated 29.03.2018. (For petitioner no. 1) and dated 05.12.2018 (for petitioner No. 2)
2. Petitioner No. 1 and 2 has joined the post of Personal Assistant at NSOU. This is the case of the petitioners that the advertisement regarding the appointment of Personal Assistant mentioned the scale of ay as Rs.9,000/---38,3,00/- with grade pay of Rs.4,600/-. After their appointment the Registrar of NSOU issued fixation orders in respect of the petitioners. However the Finance Officer of NSOU on 17.07.2020 issued a note sheet whereby grade pay for the post of Personal Assistant is revised from Rs.4,600/- to Rs.4,400/. Thereafter on 22.07.2020 on the strength of the note, the Registrar, NSOU along with the opinion of the Vice Chancellor of NSOU, revised of grade pay for the post of Personal Assistant of NSOU and initiated steps for recovery of excess drawl from the present petitioners. However on the same day a corrigendum of appointment letters of the present petitioners were issued by the Registrar NSOU.
3. This is the fact of the petitioners that, the petitioners had placed representation to the Registrar of NSOU regarding such revision of grade pay. Thereafter the Registrar of NSOU issued letter to the Special Secretary to the Government of West Bengal regarding the clarification of scale of pay for the post of Personal Assistant. The Registrar of NSOU also made correspondence with the Assistant Secretary Government of West Bengal, Department of Higher Education, University Branch regarding the determination of scale of pay for the post of Personal Assistant of the university.
4. It is the further case of the petitioners that the Vice Chancellor of NSOU also issued a letter to Special Commissioner Government of West Bengal determined of Higher Education, University Branch with regard to the pay scale for the post of Personal Assistant appointment by direct recruitment basis of other university be treated as equal to the direct recruitee in the post of Personal Assistant of NSOU. Thereafter on 27.07.2022 the Assistant Secretary Government of West Bengal Department of Higher Education University Branch, issued memorandum regarding the final determination of scale of pay for the post of Personal assistant of NSOU.
5. Being aggrieved by the said memorandum dated 27.07.2022 the writ petition has been preferred seeking specific direction upon the respondent to set aside the memorandum dated 27.07.2022 and for ancillary/corresponding relieves.
6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities in an arbitrary way revised the grade pay of the petitioners for the post of Personal Assistant from Rs.4,600/- to Rs.4,400/-. He further submits that the petitioners are the direct recruitee of NSOU through the specific memorandum of NSOU after having accord from the Finance Department Government of West Bengal. The specific scale of pay with the grade pay for the appointment to the Post of Personal Assistant has been mentioned in the said notification/memorandum. The decision of deduction of grade pay is absolutely arbitrary. He further submits that educational qualification, evaluation of duties, responsibilities of post of Personal Assistant at NSOU and Personal Assistant of other Universities are equal and equivalent. Therefore the petitioners are entitled to receive the same benefit including the grade pay for the post of Personal assistant like the other Universities.
7. Learned Advocate for the petitioner further clarified that there is no provision in the NSOU for appointment and to provide for promotion from the post of Junior Stenographer to Senior Stenographer to the post of P.A.; therefore, the GO as referred, is not at all applicable in the present ca
Surinder Singh and Anr. Vs. The Engineer in Chief, CPWD and Others
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
The court emphasized the principle of equal pay for equal work, ruling that the petitioners were entitled to the same pay scale as their counterparts in other universities due to administrative error....
Appointment of the petitioner and the re-designation are concerned, both the issues have been given a quietus by this Court. It is not that the State Government was not aware about the appointment so....
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
The service conditions for Teachers in Aided Schools and Government Schools are distinct and separate, and the appointment based on the recruitment process is independent, precluding the entitlement ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.