SHAMPA SARKAR
Nilima Paul – Appellant
Versus
Gajadhar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Sarkar, J.
1. The revisional application arises out of an order dated January 4, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 3rd Additional Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in Ejectment Suit NO.117 of 2021.
2. After 16 months from receipt of summons, applications under Section 7(1) and 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was filed by the tenant. The tenant had received summons on August 20, 2021, but did not take any steps allegedly, due to the laches of the learned advocate. The suit was fixed ex parte. The learned trial judge vacated the order by which the suit had been fixed for ex parte hearing, on the prayer of the tenant. Thereafter, the tenant/defendant filed the above applications.
3. The landlord filed an application seeking dismissal of the applications under Sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the said Act, on the ground that the said application had not been filed within one month from receipt of summons and no admitted arrears had been deposited along with 10% interest. The dismissal was sought for on the strength of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of Bijay Kumar Singh & O
The court affirmed that compliance with mandatory timelines in the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act is essential for tenants to avoid eviction due to non-payment of rent.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the statutory provisions outlined in Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and the inapplicability o....
The Supreme Court's ruling in Amit Kumar Chamariya establishes that Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to the mandatory provisions of Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, en....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the provisions of Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and the inapplicability of Section 5 of the Limi....
The tenant's failure to comply with the mandatory time limits for rent deposit under the WBPT Act results in the loss of defense against eviction, as extensions under the Limitation Act are inapplica....
The court affirmed that Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, allowing for extensions under specific conditions.
(1) Multiple dying declarations – All dying declarations should be consistent – Inconsistencies between such statements should be ‘material’ for its credibility to be shaken.(2) General rule for appr....
The essential preconditions for maintainability of an application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, are: (i) raising a dispute with regard to the rate of rent; (ii) de....
Mandatory compliance with rent deposit provisions under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act is essential; failure to comply results in striking off the defence.
Court reinforced that adherence to the mandatory deposit requirements in eviction cases is crucial, and failure to comply results in automatic consequences under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.