SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 1476

SHAMPA SARKAR
Nilima Paul – Appellant
Versus
Gajadhar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya Mr. Debasish Banerjee
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Bratin Kumar Dey

JUDGMENT :

Shampa Sarkar, J.

1. The revisional application arises out of an order dated January 4, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 3rd Additional Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in Ejectment Suit NO.117 of 2021.

2. After 16 months from receipt of summons, applications under Section 7(1) and 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was filed by the tenant. The tenant had received summons on August 20, 2021, but did not take any steps allegedly, due to the laches of the learned advocate. The suit was fixed ex parte. The learned trial judge vacated the order by which the suit had been fixed for ex parte hearing, on the prayer of the tenant. Thereafter, the tenant/defendant filed the above applications.

3. The landlord filed an application seeking dismissal of the applications under Sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the said Act, on the ground that the said application had not been filed within one month from receipt of summons and no admitted arrears had been deposited along with 10% interest. The dismissal was sought for on the strength of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of Bijay Kumar Singh & O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top