SHAMPA SARKAR, SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY
Binika Thapa (nee Rai) – Appellant
Versus
Damber Kumari Mukhia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Sarkar, J.
1. These civil revisional applications from the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri, have been referred to this Bench at the principal seat at Calcutta, in view of the divergent opinions of two learned Single Judges of this Court. The moot question involved in the applications is whether the Court can extend the time for depositing the admitted arrear rent together with statutory interest as provided in Section 7(1) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), upon condoning the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Hon’ble Chief Justice constituted this Bench to answer the reference. The points for reference are thus:-
b) Whether the Single Bench can take a different view to the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court, where it is clearly laid down that the tenant cannot take recourse to Section 5 of the Limitation Act in relation to the provision contained under Se
Bijay Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. Amit Kumar Chamariya and anr. (2019) 10 SCC 660
B.P. Khemka (P) Ltd. vs. Birendra Kumar Bhowmick (1987) 2 SCC 407
Shibu Chandra Dhar vs. Pasupati Nath Auddya (2002) 3 SCC 617
Nasiruddin v. Sita Ram Agarwal (2003) 2 SCC 577
The Supreme Court's ruling in Amit Kumar Chamariya establishes that Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to the mandatory provisions of Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, en....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the statutory provisions outlined in Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and the inapplicability o....
The court affirmed that compliance with mandatory timelines in the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act is essential for tenants to avoid eviction due to non-payment of rent.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the provisions of Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, and the inapplicability of Section 5 of the Limi....
The court affirmed that Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, allowing for extensions under specific conditions.
Section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be invoked for condoning delays in applications under Section 7(2) of the W.B.P.T. Act, as compliance with specific statutory requirements is mandatory.
The tenant's failure to comply with the mandatory time limits for rent deposit under the WBPT Act results in the loss of defense against eviction, as extensions under the Limitation Act are inapplica....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretionary power of the Civil Judge to grant an extension of time for depositing arrear rent and the inflexibility of the time limit for pay....
(1) Multiple dying declarations – All dying declarations should be consistent – Inconsistencies between such statements should be ‘material’ for its credibility to be shaken.(2) General rule for appr....
The inherent power of a court under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be exercised if it is inconsistent with any of the powers expressly or by necessary implication conferred by othe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.