Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY,
Bhavsing (died per LRs) – Appellant
Versus
Namratha – Respondent
ORDER :
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J.
These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the orders dated 27.03.2024 passed in I.A.Nos.69, 70 and 71 of 2024 in O.S.No.19 of 2010 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit vide O.S.No.19 of 2010 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, at Vikarabad, seeking declaration of title and consequential injunction against the respondents/defendants in respect of land admeasuring Ac.5-00 gts in Sy.No.237 situated at Pudur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (now Vikarabad District). While the said suit is at the stage of arguments, the petitioners/plaintiffs filed I.A.No.69 of 2024 under Order VII Rule 14(3) of CPC seeking to receive the documents i.e, certified copies of registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.2206/2019, 2648/2019 and 2649/2019, all dated 13.05.2019 on record; I.A.No.70 of 2024 under Section 151 of CPC seeking to reopen the evidence of PW.1 for further marking of documents and I.A.No.71 of 2024 to recall the evidence of PW.1 for further marking of documents. The trial Court vide separate orders dat
The trial court has discretion to deny the introduction of documents not existing at the time of the suit and lacking relevance to current proceedings.
The court established that procedural delays should not prevent the introduction of relevant evidence, prioritizing substantial justice.
Documents must be relevant to the case and cannot be introduced at a belated stage without sufficient cause, as established in the context of civil procedure.
The court upheld the trial Court's dismissal of applications to introduce documents due to lack of valid grounds for delay, affirming the importance of timely evidence submission under procedural rul....
While exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Court is not sitting as an appellate court over the orders passed by the subordinate courts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
