Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY,
Bhavsing (died per LRs) – Appellant
Versus
Namratha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of civil revision petitions and trial court's background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claim regarding the land and application details. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' arguments regarding relevance of documents. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's examination of submissions and the record. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. legal provisions for document relevance and admissibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. court's discretion on document admissibility. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. final dismissal of civil revision petitions. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J.
These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the orders dated 27.03.2024 passed in I.A.Nos.69, 70 and 71 of 2024 in O.S.No.19 of 2010 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners/plaintiffs filed a suit vide O.S.No.19 of 2010 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, at Vikarabad, seeking declaration of title and consequential injunction against the respondents/defendants in respect of land admeasuring Ac.5-00 gts in Sy.No.237 situated at Pudur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (now Vikarabad District). While the said suit is at th
The trial court has discretion to deny the introduction of documents not existing at the time of the suit and lacking relevance to current proceedings.
The court established that procedural delays should not prevent the introduction of relevant evidence, prioritizing substantial justice.
Documents must be relevant to the case and cannot be introduced at a belated stage without sufficient cause, as established in the context of civil procedure.
The court upheld the trial Court's dismissal of applications to introduce documents due to lack of valid grounds for delay, affirming the importance of timely evidence submission under procedural rul....
While exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Court is not sitting as an appellate court over the orders passed by the subordinate courts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
