SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY
Santi Moyee Manna – Appellant
Versus
Swapan Chatterjee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgement and decree passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2nd Court, Alipore, 24 South Parganas in Title Appeal No. 243 of 2013, affirming thereby judgement and decree passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, 2nd Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 233 of 2004.
2. For the sake of convenience the parties will be referred to as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court.
3. Briefly stated, the plaintiff being the executrix of the estate of late Puspa Rani Devi instituted a suit for eviction of the defendants who were the joint tenants in respect of ‘A’ schedule property on the ground of non payment of rent at the rate of Rs. 27/- according to Bengali Calendar month, since Poush, 1396 B.S. for committing various acts in the breach of provision Clause (m) (o) (p) of Section 108 of Transfer of Property Act.
4. It is contended by the plaintiff that the defendants without permission of the plaintiff demolished the southern and eastern wall of a room and constructed new pacca wall encroaching a portion of common courtyard. GI shed and wooden window with frame have been replaced by asbestos sheet
Brijendra Nath Bhargava & Anr. Vs. Harsh Wardhan & Ors.
G. Arunachalam (Dead) Through Lrs. & Anr. Vs. Thondarperienambi & Anr.
G. Reghunathan Vs. K.V. Varghese
Mohammad Ahmed & Anr. Vs. Atma Ram Chauhan & Ors.
Tenants must not make permanent alterations without consent; violations justify eviction under tenancy laws.
A tenant's change of user from commercial to residential use constitutes a breach of tenancy terms under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act, independent of any proof of damage to the prem....
A landlord cannot seek eviction on arrears of rent if the statutory notice has not followed the deadline provision while unauthorized constructions can justify eviction if they are proven to cause de....
Alterations made without permission by a tenant constitute grounds for eviction under sections 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act, invalidating contrary findings of the appellate court.
The subsequent purchase of a building by the plaintiff in the near vicinity after the passing of a decree on the ground of reasonable requirement by the First Appellate Court raises a question as to ....
1. Transfer of thika property by way of gift without obtaining prior permission from the competent authority is void under Section 5(4) of the West Bengal Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) A....
Permanent alterations made by a tenant without landlord consent constitute grounds for eviction under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act.
Important Point : The court upheld the eviction decree based on unlawful subletting and unauthorized structural alterations, interpreting lease provisions to restrict successive subletting without la....
The validity of a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is upheld, confirming the landlord's right to evict despite acceptance of rent post-termination.
Material alterations affecting rented property must permanently diminish value from the landlord's perspective to qualify for eviction under relevant law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.