SANDEEP V. MARNE
Harilal Anurup Awadhia (Since Deceased through Legal Heirs) – Appellant
Versus
Prabhakar Shravan Shinde – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. This petition is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 26 August 1999 passed by the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Regular Civil Appeal No. 218/1996 dismissing the Appeal and confirming the eviction decree dated 12 January 1994 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Kalyan in Regular Civil Suit No. 57/1981. The Trial Court has decreed the suit filed by Plaintiff-Respondent on the ground of commission of acts contrary to provisions of Section 108(o) of the Transfer Property Act by invoking provisions of Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rent (Hotels and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Bombay Rent Act). Aggrieved by the confirmation of eviction decree passed by the Appellate Court, the Petitioner-Original Defendant No. 1 has filed the present petition.
2. Plaintiff is the owner of two shops in House No. 1 in Municipal land No. 28, Tilak Chowk, Kalyan. Out of the said two shops, one shop is the suit premises in which Defendant No. 1 was inducted as monthly tenant for rent of Rs.35/-. Plaintiff instituted Regular Suit No. 57/1981 in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Kalyan contending that Defendant No. 1
Bharat Lal Baranwal vs. Virendra Kumar Agarwal
Gurdial Batra v. Raj Kumar Jain
Gurdial Batra vs. Raj Kumar Jain
Kasturchand Panachand v. Yeshwant Vinayak
A tenant's change of user from commercial to residential use constitutes a breach of tenancy terms under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act, independent of any proof of damage to the prem....
Tenants must not make permanent alterations without consent; violations justify eviction under tenancy laws.
Alterations made without permission by a tenant constitute grounds for eviction under sections 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act, invalidating contrary findings of the appellate court.
Important Point : The court upheld the eviction decree based on unlawful subletting and unauthorized structural alterations, interpreting lease provisions to restrict successive subletting without la....
Tenancy rights under a Will cannot override specific contractual terms prohibiting assignment without consent, rendering unauthorized occupation invalid under the Public Premises Act.
The court ruled that a landlord's claim for eviction on grounds of bonafide requirement is not established when evidence shows availability of alternate premises and no genuine need.
The assignment of tenancy rights under the guise of business transfer is unlawful unless it meets specific legal criteria, emphasizing genuine intent to continue the original business.
Tenant's unauthorized construction on adjoining land caused nuisance, justifying eviction under tenant protection laws, while landlord retains rights as adjoining occupier despite not residing nearby....
A landlord cannot seek eviction on arrears of rent if the statutory notice has not followed the deadline provision while unauthorized constructions can justify eviction if they are proven to cause de....
The assignment of a business must involve genuine continuity of the same business; otherwise, it constitutes unlawful subletting under the Bombay Rent Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.