Sudip Kumar Kanjilal vs Ankush Mitra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Cal) 19

BIBHAS RANJAN DE
Sudip Kumar Kanjilal – Appellant
Versus
Ankush Mitra – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Dipak Kumar Mookherjee, Adv.
For the Respondents: Sailesh Kumar Gupta, Adv., Guddu Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

1. Albeit the instant revision application has been filed challenging seven (7) orders passed by Ld. 9th bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in connection with MAC Case no. 223 of 2015 but, Ld. Counsel, Mr. Haradhan Banerjee appearing on behalf of the petitioner only pressed three (3) orders i.e. Order no. 18 dated 31.07.2017, Order no. 24 dated 04.07.2018 & Order no. 31 dated 10.06.2019.

Brief facts:-

2. From the rival contention and argument advanced by the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the parties to this revision application, it appears that challenge in this revision application is the Order No. 18 dated 31.07.2017, Order no. 24 dated 04.07.2018 and order no. 31 dated 10.06.2019 passed in connection with Motor Accident Claim Case no. 223 of 2015 by the Ld. 9th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta.

3. By the Order no. 18 dated 31.07.2017 Ld. Trial Judge allowed one amendment application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short CPC) on the ground that the proposed amendment was not inconsistent with the facts delineated in the claim application. Ld. Judge considered the proposed amendment on some subsequent fac