IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIBHAS RANJAN DE, J.
Smt. Sova Shaw & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
Partha Santra - Appellant
C.O. 3162 of 2022
Decided on : 22-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
Bibhas Ranjan De, J.
1. Challenge is the order dated 24.08.2022 passed in connection with Ejectment Suit No. 13 of 2020 whereby Ld. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bidhannagar allowed an application under Section 7 (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (for short Act of 1997) after determining the relationship of landlord and tenant, decided quantum of admitted rent and arrears rent to the tune of Rs. 36,960/- for the period since January, 2011 to December, 2019 and January, 2020 to December, 2020.
2. Plaintiff/petitioner herein filed a suit under Section 6 of the Act of 1997 for eviction and recovery of Khas possession. Defendant/opposite party herein entered appearance in the suit by filing written statement. Thereafter, defendant/opposite party herein filed application under Section 7 (1) & 7(2) of the Act of 1997 with a prayer to determine the dispute of arrears of rent.
3. Ld. Trial Judge recorded the impugned order.
4. Only issue before this Court is whether Ld. Trial Judge committed any error in finding the arrears rent admitted by the defendant in terms of Section 7 (1) of the Act of 1997.
At the Bar:-
5. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Kushal Chatterjee, appearing on behalf of the petitioners has mainly canvassed his argument on the ground that the defendant/opposite party herein did not deposit the admitted arrears rent in terms of Section 7 (1) of the Act of 1997. In support of his argument he has drawn the attention of this Court to the relevant paragraphs of written statement, petition under Section 7 (1) & 7(2) of the Act of 1997.
6. In support of his contention, Mr. Chatterjee has relied on a case of Bijay Kumar Singh and others vs. Amit Kumar Chamariya and another reported in (2019) 10 Supreme Court Cases 660.
7. In opposition to that, Ld. Counsel, Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee appearing on behalf of the defendant/opposite party has countered by submitting inter alia that nowhere in the pleadings or petitions under Section 7 (1) & 7(2) of the Act of 1997 Defendant/opposite party admitted the arrears rent. Mr. Mukherjee has tried to make this Court understand more particularly that there is no unequivocal or unconditional admission by the defendant/opposite party herein.
8. In support of his contention, Mr. Mukherjee has relied on a case of Gurmeet Singh Sidana vs. Ameek Singh Sawhney reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6230
Analysis:-
9. Before going into further discussion with respect to the intricacies of the case at hand, I think it would be profitable to first reproduce the provision of Section 7 of the Act of 1997 which runs as follows:-
(b) Such payment or deposit shall be made within one month of the service of summons on the tenant or, where he appears in the [suit] without the summons being served upon him, within one month of his appearance.
(c) The tenant shall thereafter continue to pay to the landlord or deposit with [the Civil Judge] month by month by the 15th of each succeeding month, a sum equivalent to the rent at that rate.
(2) If in any [suit] referred to in sub-section (1), there is any dispute as to the amount of the rent payable by the tenant, the tenant shall, within the time specified in that sub-section, deposit with [the Civil Judge] the amount admitted by him to be due from him together with an application for determination of the rent payable. No such deposit shall be accepted unless it is accompanied by an application for determination of the rent payable. On receipt of the application, [
Bijay Kumar Singh and others vs. Amit Kumar Chamariya and another reported in (2019) 10 SCC 660
An admission of arrears of rent must be clear and unambiguous to relieve the opponent of the burden of proof; otherwise, it affects the right to defend against eviction.
The essential preconditions for maintainability of an application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, are: (i) raising a dispute with regard to the rate of rent; (ii) de....
The tenant must deposit admitted arrears of rent with interest within the statutory timeframe to avoid eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.
Under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, a tenant must deposit all arrears calculated at the last paid rate to secure protection against eviction, with the court mandated to address unresolved iss....
Tenants must strictly adhere to rent payment protocols to avoid eviction; failure to comply with statutory requirements leads to serious legal consequences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.