SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 37

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH, J.
Ram Charan Bansal Construction Pvt. Ltd & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Respondents
C.R.R. 292 of 2024
Decided on : 08-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Rima Sarkar, Ms. Sidhi Sethia, Mr. Suparna Paul
For the Respondent: Mr. Tapas Ch. Bhattacharya, Mr. Subhajyoti Ghosh, Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Sourav Ganguly.

A mere breach of contract does not constitute an offence under Section 420 IPC unless fraudulent intention is established at the time of the promise.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420 and 120B - Complaint for cheating and criminal conspiracy - Allegations of non-payment of dues amounting to Rs.3,25,000/- for goods supplied - Court held that mere non-payment does not constitute an offence under Section 420 IPC, distinguishing between civil disputes and criminal offences. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Jurisdiction to quash proceedings - Court emphasized that criminal proceedings should not be initiated for mere recovery of dues, which is a civil matter. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The complainant supplied goods worth Rs.4,75,200/- to the accused, receiving an advance of Rs.1,50,000/-, but the accused failed to pay the outstanding balance of Rs.3,25,000/-. The complainant alleged cheating and conspiracy due to non-payment despite reminders.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the allegations did not disclose an offence under Section 420 IPC and quashed the complaint, stating it was a civil dispute.

Issues: Whether the failure to pay the outstanding dues constitutes an offence under Section 420 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating unless there is fraudulent intention at the time of the promise.

Result: Complaint case CR Case No. 333 of 2017 is quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Tirthankar Ghosh, J.

1. The present revisional application has been preferred challenging the proceeding arising out of a complaint case being CR Case No. 333 of 2017 under Section 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate 3rd Court Siliguri.

2. The allegations made in the petition of complaint were to the effect that as follows:

    “That the Complainant company represented by the authorize signatory namely Ramesh Maheshwari carries on its business of is a resident of Sri Ram Market, Sevoke Road, Siliguri – 734001.

    That in pursuance of accused person's order the complainant company supplied 11 nos of 630 mm PN 4 PE 80 HDPE Pipe (6 Mtr. Long) amounting to Rs. 4,75, 200.00 to the accused persons vide tax invoice no UPPLT/029/16-17 and Challan No. 029/16-17 dated 06.12.2016 upon receipt of Rs. 1,50,000/- as advance and the accused persons assured the complainant to pay the balance amount of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Approx) to and in favour of the complainant company upon receipt of goods by the accused persons.

    That considering the relationship between the complainant and the accused persons the complainant supplied the above materials as per the demand of the accused persons and the said materials duly received by the accused persons.

    That subsequently the accused persons intentionally avoided and neglected to pay the complainant company the said balance amount of Rs.3,25,000/- (Approx) despite several request and reminders vide letters dated 22.12.2016, 16.01.2017, 16.02.2017 & 06.04.2017 were made by the complainant company to the accused persons.

    It is not out of place to mention herein that against the above referred letters of the complainant company the accused persons denied to make payment to the complainant company on false, incorrect, vague and baseless allegation though it was admitted by the accused persons regarding receipt of the above materials by them.

    That it is stated herein that inspite of correspondence the accused persons are ignoring the payment of dues to the complainant company, though the accused persons are willful and deliberate failure, refusal and neglect to make payment of the said amount of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Approx) to the complainant, the accused persons have dishonestly altered and destroyed the amount for their personal gain, that the said amount was a valuable security, which the accused persons has fraudulently, intentionally and dishonestly converted into a valuable security in the accused persons name.

    That the accused persons said act of malicious, motivated, willful and fraudulent act/s clearly and manifestly proves the fact that the accused persons have fraudulent & dishonest intention of cheating.

    That due to non-payment of aforesaid outstanding sum of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Approx) to the complainant has been computing huge financial loss and mental agony.

    That the complainant upon good faith and upon the accused persons request, representations, and assurances that the accused persons would pay to the complainant the balance amount of goods supplied to them as afore stated.

    That despite the complainant regular follow-ups and inspite of the complainant's repeated requests, reminders, and demands and sufficient opportunities granted to the accused persons, the accused persons had willfully and deliberately failed, refused and neglected to make payment of the outstanding dues of Rs.3,25,000/- (Approx).

    That the accused persons have miserably failed neglected and refused to make payment of the said outstanding dues of the complainant amounting to Rs.3,25,000/- (Approx).

    That the accused persons therefore committed the offence of criminal conspiracy and cheating with the ulterior motive of defrauding the complainant and causing wrongful loss to the complainant in every aspect.

    That the accused persons have therefore cheated the complainant by fraudulently and dishonestly inducing the complainant to supply goods as above by the accused persons and intentionally induced the c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top