THOMAS WILLIAM RICHARDSON, PAGE, CUMING, C. C. GHOSE, ASUTOSH MOOKERJEE
Emperor – Appellant
Versus
Barendra Kumar Ghose – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mookerjee, J. - This is an application for review of a criminal case on the certificate of the Advocate-General under Clause 26 of the Letters Patent. The petitioner Barendra Kumar Ghosh was tried on the 16th and 17th August at the Fourth Criminal Sessions of this year, by Mr. Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty of murder, with the result that the accused was convicted and sentenced to deatli u/s 302. On the 22nd August, an application was made on his behalf to the Advocate-General for a certificate under Clause 26 of the Letters Patent. On the 27th August, the Advocate-General heard Counsel for the prisoner in support of the application. On the 29th August, the Advocate-General granted a certificate in the following terms:
2. "Certificate of the Advocate General of Bengal under Clause 26 of the Letters Patent of 1865.
3. "I. Whereas the accused above named was on the 16th August, 1923, charged at the Criminal Sessions holden in this Hon'ble Court in its Criminal Jurisdicti
The Court upheld convictions under IPC sections for attempted murder and assault, emphasizing the weight of eyewitness and medical testimony, and affirming the principle of common intention among mul....
Revisional jurisdiction limited; no interference with concurrent convictions absent perversity. Minor witness discrepancies and investigation lapses not fatal where prosecution testimonies reliable a....
(1) Common intention – An act would mean and include other acts along with it – Section 34 IPC creates a deeming fiction by infusing and importing a criminal act constituting an offence committed by ....
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Ashok Kumar Jain For the Respondent : R. K. Awasthi
In custodial death cases, all involved in the torture share liability under Section 34 IPC regardless of direct participation, as joint culpability is established by shared common intention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.