SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Cal) 37

Abdul Rahim – Appellant
Versus
King-Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The three appellants before us and one Abdul Latif were dried before (she Additional Sessions Judge of Backargunj and a Jury on various charges. The committing Magistrate framed the following charges, against Abdul Rahim, Abdul Latif and Saripali Khan, first, with having committed muder by causing the death of Mahomed Sikdar punishable u/s 302, Indian Penal Code and secondly that they were member; of a criminal conspiracy to commit this murder, an offence punishable u/s 102 B of the Indian Penal Code. Aiman Bibi was charged with having been member of the criminal conspiracy with the other three accused be commit murder by causing the death of her husband Mahomed Sikdar, an offence punishable u/s 120B, Indian Penal Code. The learned Sessions Judge amended the charges. He struck out the name of Saripali Khan from the charge that had been framed against him jointly with Abdul Rahim and Abdul Latif. The two remaining accused were charged with conspiring together and with Saripali Khan. He added a charge against Saripali Khan charging him in the alternative with having committed murder punishable u/s 302, Indian Penal Code or causing evidence of commission of the murder to di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top