IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Priyanka Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Anil Chowdhury – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sugato Majumdar, J.
The Court: G.A.3 of 2022 is filed by the Defendant No.3 being M/s Asian Tea & Exports Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, praying for referring the instant dispute to arbitration.
The sum and substance of the application may be summarized as follow :
i. A Share Transfer Agreement was executed on 12/09/2014 between Late Devrat Gupta (the original Plaintiff No.1, who left for heavenly abode during pendency of the suit), Smt. Kashmira Gupta (Plaintiff No.4), Sri Devansh Gupta (Plaintiff No.3), Smt. Priyanka Gupta (Plaintiff No.2) and Smt. Mridula Gupta (Plaintiff No.5), who were the Sellers, on the one hand and M/s Asian Tea & Exports Ltd. (Defendant No.3) and Sri Hariram Garg (Defendant No.4), on the other hand, who were the Buyers. This agreement was executed for transfer by the Sellers in favor of the Buyers 9,50,000 number of fully paid up equity shares of Rs.10/- each in the Defendant.5, namely, M/s Indong Tea Comp. Pvt. Ltd.
ii. In course of transfer of shares, an escrow account was required to be created appointing Escrow Holders. The Defendant Nos.1 & 2 were appointed as the Escrow Holders in terms of the Escrow Agreement dated 1
Ameet Lal Chand Sha & Ors. Vs Rishab Enterprises & Ors.
NBCC (India) Ltd. vs Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
Bihar State Mineral Development Corpn. v. Encon Builders (I) (P) Ltd.
M.R. Engineers & Contractors (P) Ltd. v. Som Datt Builders Ltd.
Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under Arbitration, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899, In re
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Tipper Chand
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.