SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 706

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J. 
Ranajit Sardar and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
WPA No. 22807 of 2025
Decided On : 14-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Chitta Priya Ghosh, Somesh Kumar Ghosh
For the Respondents: Sanghamitra Nandy, B.P. Vaisya, Gourav Das
For the WBBPE : Ratul Biswas, Kaushik Chowdhury

Court allows in-service primary teachers to pursue a D.El.Ed. course despite lacking required qualifications, emphasizing their rights under prior recruitment regulations and ensuring no service disruption.

Headnote:(A) Right to Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - National Council for Teacher Education guidelines - In-service primary teachers appointed under the recruitment process of 2009 seeking permission to pursue a 2-year D.El.Ed. course while continuing service - Court allows relaxation of eligibility criteria and directs authorities to include them in the admission process. (Paras 3, 11, 12)

(B) Education - Recruitment - Court emphasizes that teachers, despite lacking specific qualifications due to previous regulations, should be permitted to upgrade their qualifications without service interruption. (Paras 6, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, primary teachers in South 24-Parganas, qualified under a past recruitment process but lacked mandated D.El.Ed. qualifications due to subsequent NCTE guidelines. Despite delays, they sought permission to complete their training.

Findings of Court:
The court recognized that all petitioners stand on the same footing as others granted relief and ordered them to be allowed to complete necessary qualifications while receiving their salaries.

Issues: The primary issues revolved around the eligibility for D.El.Ed. course admission amidst changes in qualification requirements and delays in recruitment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that teachers appointed from the 2009 process, despite the lack of certain qualifications, could be granted special concessions to pursue further education while continuing to work.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for authorities.

Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria and qualification requirements for teachers. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 9)
2. petitioners seek similar treatment as other untrained teachers. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court grants relaxation of eligibility criteria for current situation. (Para 7 , 8 , 13)
4. necessary compliance with statutory requirements while serving. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. order finalization and communication for compliance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.

1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.

2. By the present writ petition the petitioners seek for permission to undergo 2-year D.El.Ed. course for the sessions 2025-2027 from any Government recognized private self-financed institutions in addition to Government sponsored and the Government aided PTTI and DIET and entitling the petitioners to take admission in 2-year D.El.Ed. course for the sessions 2025-2027 in the same manner as has been extended to the other untrained teachers recruited under the same recruitment process of 2009 in other districts.

3. The petitioners are primary teachers in different schools in the district of South 24-Parganas. The petitioners appeared in the examination conducted for recruitment of primary teachers in different primary schools pursuant to notification dated 30th August, 2009. As per the eligibility criteria in the said advertisement the age limit was within 18 to 40 years of age group and the required qualification was of Madhyamik or equivalent for participating in the selection process. All the petitioners qualified in the said written examination. However, after prolonged litigations the petitioners were ultimately appointed from 2023 onwards. After promulgation to Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, the National Council for Teacher Education (in short, ‘NCTE’) issued guidelines that the teachers in the primary schools should possess 50% marks in Higher Secondary and they are also required to complete 2-year D.El.Ed. course. At the time when the petitioners applied for joining as primary teachers, there was no requirement for such qualification. However, with the issuance of guidelines of NCTE, it has become imperative to possess such qualification. The petitioners presently do not have the said qualification. Accordingly, the petitioners seek to complete the qualification as required under the NCTE recruitment, 2010 and 2011. Hence, this writ petition seeking requisite permission.

4. Mr. Chitta Priya Ghosh, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in WPA No. 13989 of 2025 (Partha Das & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) with WPA No. 13966 of 2025 (Rajkumar Dogra & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) the West Bengal Board of Primary Education have issued notification in respect of untrained teachers in the district of Malda and North 24-Parganas allowing them to submit application for admission to two-year D.El.Ed. course for the session 2025-27. The petitioners are similarly circumstanced. He submits that similar direction be issued to the Commissioner of School Education, Government of West Bengal, in consultation with the West Bengal Board of Primary Education to forthwith publish the consolidated list of eligible untrained teachers along with recognised institutions, including Government sponsored, Government aided and Government recognised self-financed institutions for offering such course.

5. Mr. Ratul Biswas, learned Advocate for the West Bengal Board of Primary Education and Mr. B.P. Vaisya, learned Advocate for the D.P.S.C. South 24- Parganas, respondent nos.3 and 5 and Ms. Sanghamitra Nandy, learned Advocate for the State submit that similar direction as issued in the other writ petitions may be issued in the present case as well.

6. Admittedly, the petitioners before this Hon’ble Court are serving as Assistant Teachers in various primary schools in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top