SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 762

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, JJ.
Tasirul Islam & Ors. –Appellant 
Versus
The State of West Bengal –Respondent 
C.R.A. 14 of 2016 With I.A. No. CRAN 5 of 2022 With C.R.A. 15 of 2016 With C.R.A. 52 of 2016
Decided On : 13-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants: Mr. Arnav Chatterjee, Mr. Amit Ray, Mr. Avik Ghosh, Ms. A. Ghosh. (in CRA 14 of 2016, CRA 15 of 2016 and CRA 52 of 2016) for Naimul, Mumtaja and Jahidul.
For the Appellants: Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Mr. Marghoob Shalik, Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee. Ms. Labani Sikder, Mr. Souvik Dey. (in CRA 14 of 2016) for Tashirul Islam.
For the Appellants: Mr. Sumanta Ganguly, Mr. Rajiv Lochan Chakrborty, Mr. Debapratim Guha, Ms. Pallavi Chatterjee, Ms. Anchita Sardar, Ms. Sneha Bakshi. …for the appellant no. 3, Md. Batul in CRA 14 of 2016.
For the State: Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Mainak Gupta.
For the De Facto: Mr. Partha Ghosh, complainant: Mr. Arijit Ghosh, Mr. Debashis Das, Mr.

Conviction for gang rape can be upheld solely based on the victim's reliable testimony, corroborated by medical evidence, regardless of inconsistencies or lack of immediate identification of the accused.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(g) - Conviction of appellants for kidnapping and gang rape - The appellants followed and assaulted a victim girl, abducting her and committing severe sexual violence against her in a tea garden - Medical reports corroborated the victim's allegations against the appellants despite previous sexual history noted - The evidence supported the prosecution case notwithstanding some inconsistencies in victim statements - Omission of mobile phone seizure and naming of accused did not negate the crime - Sentences upheld as no mitigating circumstances existed due to the gravity of the crime. (Paras 53-84)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 161 and 164 - Provision on evidentiary value of victim's statements - Conviction upheld solely on victim’s reliable testimony accompanied by corroborative evidence. (Paras 61-65)

Table of Content
1. details of victim abduction and assault (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. victim's condition post-assault and medical treatment (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. filing and implications of fir (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. witness testimonies and evidence collection (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. additional corroborative witness accounts (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. evidence related to school documentation (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
7. circumstances surrounding the accused's arrest (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
8. medical examination findings (Para 45 , 46 , 47)
9. medical testimony and implications of evidence (Para 48 , 49)
10. court's viewpoint on witness reliability (Para 51 , 52 , 53)
11. appellants' arguments against evidence (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
12. court's counterarguments to appellants' claims (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
13. analysis of fsl report evidentiary standards (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68)
14. assessment of tasirul's implication (Para 69 , 70 , 71)
15. rivalry as a potential motive (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76)
16. sentencing considerations in serious crimes (Para 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
17. final sentencing and dismissing appeals (Para 81 , 82)

Judgment :

Rajasekhar Mantha, J.

1. The subject appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 3rd December 2015 and order of sentence dated 4th December 2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Court No. 1 at Islampur, Uttar Dinajpur in Sessions Trial No. 11/2014 arising out of the Sessions Case No. 143 of 2013. The appellants in the four appeals were convicted under Sections 363 /366/376(2)(g)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

THE PROSECUTION CASE:

2. On 20th April, 2012, the victim girl “X” was going to her school around noon time, to fetch her results of the 11th standard examination. She first, by bicycle, reached her friend’s house, Sikha Pal, (PW-11), to change into her school uniform. She thereafter boarded a rickshaw.

3. On the wayrickshaw van, was followed by four persons, namely, Jahidul Rehman, Md. Batul, Naimul Hoque and Tasirul Islam on two motor cycles. They were preceded by a Maruti van, driven by Mumtaj Hussain. There were four other masked persons in the Maruti van.

4. The rickshaw vanpuller initially picked up speed noticing the chase. He however gradually slowed down as the Maruti Van, followed by the said two motorcycles sped to overtake him. Jahidul Rehman is stated to have inflicted some blows on “X”, when the rickshaw van came close to the said three vehicles. Jahidul then kicked “X” out from rickshaw van and she fell on the road. The Maruti van was also stopped at when the incident was unfolding. Tasirul Islam, Naimul Hoque and Jahidul Rehman came out and put a tape on the mouth of the victim girl and tied her hands, and carried her into the Maruti van.

5. Initially, Jahidul Rehman suggested that the victim should be killed by inflicting fist and blows. The appellants however thereafter changed their mind and drove away with “X”.

6. The appellants stopped in front of Kusum Tea Garden and carried “X” into it. They kept on assaulting “X” and laid her on a drain inside the tea garden. They removed the tape on the mouth of the victim, disrobed her and committed rape upon her. “X” deposed that she was raped by at least eight persons. The assailants including the appellants are stated to have bitten the victim on private parts on the victim’s torso, scratched the victim and inflicted injuries on various parts of the body while and after the ravaging.

7. After assaulting and committing rape upon the victim, Jahidul Rehman is stated to have initially wanted to kill the victim with a gun. He was however restrained by others who said that noise of the firing would alert others. Jahidul Rehman tried to strangle the victim “X” by pressing his foot on X’sneck.

8. As a result of assault and rape, “X” was rendered partially conscious. She, however, played dead, when Jahidul Rehman pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top