Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Anup Mula – Appellant
Versus
West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim employment under land-loser category. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner’s judicial history regarding employment claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. allegations of administrative injustice and violation of rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. defendants’ arguments regarding statutory employment claims. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. responses to petitioners concerning employment eligibility. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. statutory framework governing employment for land losers. (Para 24 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. court's ruling on eligibility and rights of petitioner. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. writ petitions dismissed based on statutory provisions. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.
1. The petitioners have approached this Hon’ble Court invoking its extraordinary constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to engage the petitioner no. 1 under the Land-Loser category, and to extend suitable employment to the nominee of petitioner no. 3, whose land was acquired for the establishment of the Kolaghat Thermal Power Project of the West Bengal State Electricity Board (
Claims for employment related to land acquisition must comply with statutory provisions, and significant delays can bar such claims.
The court established that employment entitlements under land acquisition policies must be honored as per the terms in effect at the time of acquisition, ensuring adherence to principles of natural j....
Railway land losers policy withdrawal held prospective; pre-existing applications recommended before withdrawal entitled to consideration under earlier scheme, not retrospectively denied.
Withdrawal of scheme for employment of land losers bars their claim for employment.
Delay and laches can bar a petitioner from seeking redress, and the court may refuse to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to protect those who have slept over wrongs and allowed illegalities to....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of land losers cannot be claimed as a matter of right and any government order providing employment to one member of a family ....
Railway rehabilitation policy strictly limits employment to son/daughter/spouse of land losers, not grandchildren; delayed claims barred by laches.
Employment assistance claims under rehabilitation schemes must be timely and supported by evidence of eligibility, particularly regarding the dependency on acquired land.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
