SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Dhajbeer Singh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand through Secretary URJA(Energy, Alternative Energy) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
As a consequence of the enforcement of the project called as “Lakhwar Vyashi Hydro Dam”, which was to be constructed over the Yamuna River, certain surrounding areas of the land adjoining to the Dam and the Barrage, were acquired which was initiated at the behest of respondent No.2 herein, who had launched the project, for laying down the Dam, as referred above the land of villagers, likely to be effected by the project, was acquired under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends, that the State of Uttarakhand under the Policy, which has been framed by virtue of a Notification, being Notification No. 1229/1(2)/2013/05/104/2005 T.C.-1 dated 28th June 2013, to be read with a Policy, which was called as “Rehabilitation and reconstruction for Hydro Project Policy 2013” had laid down certain parameters for acquisition of land.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends, that as many as 311 posts of Junior Engineer (Civil, Mechanical & Electrical) were advertised to be filled in, out of which, 38 posts of Civil Engineer and 15 posts of Electrical and Mechanical engineers, who were to be given appointments, were amongst fro
Butu Prasad Kumbhar and Ors. v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others
Butu Prasad Kumbhar and others Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Others
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh and others
Banwasi Seva Ashram v. State of U.P.
Calcutta Port Trust v. Deba Prosad Bag
Delhi Administration v. Manohar Lal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.