Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Niranjan Hazra – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests action on prior application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details regarding the award and its implications. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. understanding section 33c pathways for claims. (Para 6 , 8 , 14) |
| 4. section 33c(1) allows for recovery from dues. (Para 9 , 13 , 25) |
| 5. computation authority and disputes defined. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. liquidation context and claims process. (Para 23 , 24 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. judgment concludes with directions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
1. The writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondent authorities, more specifically the respondent no.2 herein to dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 20th April, 2018 filed under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act expeditiously.
2. In course of hearing, the 1st report placed by the authority concerned being the Joint Labour Commissioner-P Enforcement of Law and Minimum Wages, 2nd Office of the Labour Commissioner, Calcutta, regarding the status of the case is as follows:-
“After perusal of the submitted documents it appeared to the then Assistant Labour Commissioner being the Enquiry Officer that the matter re
Application under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is unmaintainable without prior computation of dues, but may proceed under Section 33C(2) where the Labour Court has the authority to d....
The appropriate government should act only as an executory court and leave adjudication to the tribunal/labour court. The absence of a pre-determined right in favor of the workmen precluded the issua....
The appropriate government lacks jurisdiction under Section 33C(1) to issue recovery orders without prior adjudication of the workers' claims, emphasizing that such claims must arise from recognized ....
The Labour Court lacks the authority to award interest in proceedings under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as such provisions are not included in the statutory framework governi....
Labour Law - Offence by companies, etc - Retrenchment - Section 32 every director, manager, Secretary etc. shall be deemed to be guilty of the offences committed under the Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
