Back
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its General Manager – Appellant
Versus
Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of arbitration settlement and its implications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. status of implementation of arbitration award. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interim orders and their effects on the case. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. responsibility to submit worker lists during arbitration. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. rights confirmed under precedent laws with no agreements. (Para 15) |
| 6. judicial review on labor claim jurisdiction asserted. (Para 17) |
| 7. highlighting prior compliance and labor rights under i.d. act. (Para 18 , 19 , 35) |
| 8. jurisdiction of appropriate government under section 33c. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. issues of maintainability concerning submission and withdrawal of petitions. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 10. indicating court's conclusion on disputed worker rights. (Para 33 , 37 , 39) |
| 11. elements of recovery under section 33c of the i.d. act. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 12. final decision regarding the writ petition. (Para 47 , 49) |
| 13. final ruling affirms prior disputes must return to arbitration. (Para 48) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition to quash the order dated 28.12.2018 (Annexure P/1) passed in Case No. BSP-7(03)/2018-RLC by Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Bila
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
