Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Md. Nausad Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of common issues in the writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding tainted candidates and supporting judgments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's consideration of prior judgments applied to current petitions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. dismissal of writ petitions based on the established ratio. (Para 12) |
| 5. conclusion and order without costs. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.
1. Affidavits-of service filed in respect of WPA 19994 of 2025 and WPA 20893 of 2025 on behalf of the petitioners are taken on record.
2. All the writ petitions are taken up for consideration since common issues are involved.
3. Petitioners are declared as tainted candidates and their names featured in the list dated 30th August, 2025 which was published by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission. By publishing list dated 30th August, 2025 petitioners since are termed as tainted they will not be permitted to participate in the ensuing examinations scheduled on 7th September, 2025 and 14th September, 2025.
4. The Examinations which are to be held on 7th September, 2025 and 14th September, 2025 are parts of selection process which have been initiated in ter
The court upheld the designation of petitioners as tainted candidates based on previously established criteria, affirming dismissal of their writ petitions.
The classification of candidates as tainted extends beyond previously defined categories, and judicial intervention is precluded by ongoing Supreme Court considerations.
Tainted candidates are barred from participating in the recruitment process according to the Supreme Court's directives on fraudulent appointments and adherence to prior recruitment rules.
Writ petitions are not maintainable if earlier judgments have merged with a subsequent Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing compliance responsibility falls under higher authority.
Tainted candidates from previous fraudulent selections cannot be allowed in fresh recruitment processes, as it breaches fundamental justice and undermines public trust in educational integrity.
Court affirms the right of untainted candidates to participate in the counseling process for teaching positions, despite previous absences, ensuring no dilution of merit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
