SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 849

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.
Chhandana Bhuin - Petitioner 
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A 16708 of 2025
Decided On : 16-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Mr. Pronay Basak, Ms. Aishwarya Datta, Mr. Mahammed Reajul.
For the State : Mr. Biswaroop Chowdhury, Ms. Soma Chakraborty.
For the DPSC, Hooghly : Mr. Subir Sanyal, Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Mr. Ratul Biswas, Mr. Aaman Arif Ansari.

The Chairperson of the District Primary School Council lacks authority to transfer a teacher in the absence of a constituted Council, violating statutory rules and principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) The West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 - Sections 37, 53, and 42(2) - West Bengal Primary Education (Transfer of Teachers including Head Teacher) Rules, 2002 - Transfer of a teacher without valid reconstitution of the District Primary School Council and in violation of statutory rules questioned - Demotion from Head Teacher to Assistant Teacher for alleged misconduct without proper inquiry considered arbitrary and unlawful. (Paras 8, 10, 40, 46)

(B) Jurisdictional errors - Exercise of power by the Chairperson of the District Primary School Council held to be ultra vires in the absence of a properly constituted Council as required under the Act and Rules - Violation of principles of natural justice emphasized. (Paras 11, 36, 44)

(C) Constitutional rights infringements - Arbitrary transfer and demotion addressed as violations of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, prejudicing employment rights of the teacher approaching retirement. (Paras 10, 42, 44)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged her transfer from the position of Head Teacher to Assistant Teacher due to alleged misconduct including corporal punishment. She argued the transfer was arbitrary, unlawful, and carried out without proper authority or adherence to procedural safeguards. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
The court found the transfer order invalid due to the lack of a properly constituted Council and violation of rules governing teacher transfer, quashing the impugned order and allowing the petitioner to continue in her position. (Paras 46)

Issues: Whether the transfer order was made by a competent authority, and whether the action violated the procedural safeguards and principles of natural justice. (Paras 11, 43)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Chairperson of the District Primary School Council acted beyond jurisdiction in issuing the transfer without a constituted Council, emphasizing the need for lawful authority and adherence to principles of natural justice. (Paras 40, 46)

Result: Writ petition allowed; transfer order quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's employment background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legal challenge to transfer order. (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 20)
3. jurisdictional disputes regarding the council. (Para 6 , 18 , 19)
4. existence of alternative remedies. (Para 9 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 17)
5. statutory competence and jurisdictional authority. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 42 , 44)
6. judgment conclusion and order. (Para 46 , 48)

JUDGMENT :

Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.

1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner, has approached this Hon’ble Court against the action of the respondent authority, namely the Chairperson of the Hooghly District Primary School Council being the respondent no.5 herein, challenging her transfer order and demotion from the post of Head Teacher to Assistant Primary Teacher.

2. The facts of the case in a nutshell are that the petitioner joined public service as an Assistant Primary Teacher of Sonipur Primary School under Hooghly District Primary School Council, pursuant to a Memorandum of appointment dated 28.04.1993 issued by the Chairman, Ad-hoc Committee. She duly joined the said school on 30.04.1993 and her service was formally approved by the competent authority. On 04.11.2004, the petitioner was appointed as the Head Teacher of Samantakhanda Primary School (KP-46) under Kamarpukur Circle, Hooghly. Since then, she has been discharging her duties sincerely and diligently, earning recognition in the form of three awards, two from the State Government (Nirmal Vidyalaya Puraskar and Sishu Mitra Puraskar) and one from the Central Government (Sachh Vidyalaya Puraskar).

3. Presently at the age of 59 years, the petitioner is suffering from serious ailments, including severe cardiac issues. She underwent Cardioversion treatment last year and is scheduled for Ablation treatment within months. Despite such conditions, she continued to serve in her post. The petitioner received a memo bearing no. 960/DPSC, Hooghly from the Chairperson of the Hooghly District Primary School Council (DPSC) dated 11.07.2025, calling her to a hearing on 15.07.2025 regarding allegations of physical punishment of a student. She asserts that the allegations are false, malicious and intended to malign her reputation. Rather, according to the petitioner, she herself had been assaulted by a student’s parent, in respect to which she lodged a complaint with the local police station. Mass petitions by her students also supported her innocence. At the said hearing, according to her, she was subjected to harassment, denied a copy of the complaint and not informed of the precise charges.

4. Subsequently, the Chairperson of Hooghly District Primary School Council issued an Order vide memo no. 1039/DPSC, Hooghly dated 21.07.2025 transferring her to Batanol Upendra S.N.S.N. Primary School, Arambagh East Circle, by stepping her down from the post of Head Teacher to Assistant Teacher, subject to clearance from the Chief Medical Officer of Health. This was followed the next day by a corrigendum order dated 22.07.2025. The petitioner highlights that such transfer was ordered just months before her superannuation in 2026, contrary to Rule 4 and Rule 5 of the West Bengal Primary Education (Transfer of Teachers including Head Teacher) Rules, 2002. She underscores that the statute vests transfer powers exclusively with the District Primary School Council and not its chairperson individually. In the instant case, with no functional Council in place, the unilateral transfer order was issued without jurisdiction. In these circumstances, the petitioner asserts that the impugned order is arbitrary and violative of the statutory provisions as well as her rights. Therefore, the present petition has been preferred.

5. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been compelled to approach this Hon’ble Court assailing the impugned order of transfer issued vide memo no. 1039/DPSC, Hooghly dated 21.07.2025 followed by corrigendum dated 22.07.2025, by which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top