IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
Harminder Singh Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendment of appeal memorandum permitted. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of complaints on illegal mining stated. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. penalty imposed for unauthorized mining activities. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. challenges against imposed penalty noted. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. arguments regarding jurisdiction and penalty discussed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 21) |
| 6. counterarguments regarding ongoing mining activities. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. legal limits of restoration and penalties examined. (Para 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. legal basis for affirming the appeal discussed. (Para 38 , 39 , 43) |
| 9. reliance on reports for penalties critically assessed. (Para 41 , 44) |
| 10. final judgment set aside and appeal allowed. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 11. clarifications and procedural directives issued. (Para 48 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT :
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
1. Leave is granted to the learned advocate for the appellant in both the appeals to amend the memoranda of appeal by incorporating the appropriate date of the impugned order of the writ court.
2. The present appeals have been preferred against an order passed by the learned Single Judge in connection with two writ petitions, one
The court emphasized that penalties for illegal mining must align with statutory provisions, confirming the authority's limits in directing land restoration without proper jurisdiction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of observing the principles of natural justice in administrative decisions, and the requirement for authorities to consider relevant....
For the purpose of Rule 35-A, if the Government feels that the orders passed by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, on 16.10.2018 were not in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the D....
Issuing a notice that effectively determines liability without due process violates the principles of natural justice, making the notice invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for proper consideration and compliance with principles of natural justice in issuing orders related to quarry leases and demand no....
Point of Law : Discriminatory nature in which impugned order of punishment has been passed and, as such, the action of the administrative authority cannot be sustained.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.