SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 1714

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
MADHURESH PRASAD, SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Gita Das – Appellant
Versus
Lily Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Krishna Das Poddar

Judgment :

Madhuresh Prasad, J. 

1. The appellant was the plaintiff in a suit for ejectment. The eviction was sought on the ground of reasonable requirement and on the ground of default. The trial court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff directing the defendant therein to deliver khas possession to the plaintiff failing which the plaintiff was granted liberty to get the decree executed through the court.

2. The tenant being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the decree preferred the instant appeal. The first appellate court namely, the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track 2nd Court, Sealdah, had allowed the appeal of the tenants setting aside the decree pronounced by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court, Sealdah. The same is the subject-matter of the present appeal at the instance of the plaintiff/landlord.

3. The brief factual matrix of the case is that the tenants were occupying an asbestos shed pucca room in the first floor with common bath and privy being the suit premises. The same was possessed by the defendants in the capacity of a tenant at a monthly rental value of Rs.199.50. It is the case of the plaintiff that the tenancy was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top