SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 500

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS, JJ.
Soumya Kanti Biswas – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
W.P.S.T. No. 154 of 2025
Decided On : 20-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Partha Pratim Roy, Santanu Das, Sagnik Bhattacharya
For the Respondents: Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Debopriyo Karan

A statutory disability certificate issued by a competent authority holds legal primacy and cannot be invalidated or superseded by a general medical fitness report, as the latter lacks the authority to re-determine the degree of disability established under protective legislation.

Headnote:(A) Protective Legislation - Disability - Statutory validity of certificates - Validity of disability certificates issued under relevant rules - Primacy of statutory certification over general medical assessment for employment - A certificate of disability issued by the competent authority in accordance with statutory provisions remains valid and cannot be ignored or overridden by a medical board constituted under general service rules for regular medical fitness examinations - (Paras 16, 17, 19, 22).

(B) Service Law - Recruitment - Medical examination for employment - Purpose and scope - Medical fitness assessment under general service rules is restricted to determining physical suitability to perform duties and does not confer authority to re-determine or review the degree of disability previously certified under protective legislation - (Paras 21, 22, 23).

(C) Administrative Law - Statutory sanctity of documents - Once a disability certificate is issued under prevalent law, it holds statutory sanctity and remains binding on the employer unless invalidated through specific legal procedures - (Paras 15, 18, 25).

Facts of the case:
The aspirant, possessing a permanent disability, was selected for a government position. Following a general medical examination conducted for fitness purposes, the candidature was cancelled on the premise of a lower claimed percentage of disability compared to the existing valid certificate. The administrative tribunal rejected the challenge to this cancellation, leading to the present proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the general medical examination served the limited administrative purpose of assessing physical fitness for service and was not competent to review or override disability percentages established by designated medical boards.

Issues: Whether a general medical fitness report could override a valid statutory disability certificate for the purpose of claiming reservation benefits in public employment.

Ratio Decidendi: Statutory disability certificates possess legal sanctity and binding effect. A medical board established under general service rules lacks the legal mandate to re-evaluate or negate the degree of disability already determined through official channels under special protective legislation.

Result: Petition allowed; cancellation order quashed; authorities directed to proceed with appointment.

Table of Content
1. factual sequence of employment selection and subsequent candidature cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. identification of the core legal conflict regarding the evidentiary weight of statutory disability certificates. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. statutory certificates of disability maintain priority over general medical examination reports. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. distinction between general medical fitness requirements and specialised disability accreditation processes. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. quashing of the administrative order and directive for appointment completion. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

MADHURESH PRASAD, J.

1. The writ petitioner was the applicant before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter in short referred to as the Tribunal). His Original Application (OA) bearing number 423 of 2024, was rejected by the Tribunal by its order dated 15.05.2025, which is the subject matter of the present Writ Petition.

2. The factual background to filing of the OA is that the applicant was diagnosed with Mild Cerebral Palsy with Right Sided Hemiparesis when he was four years of age. The diagnosis continued consistently throughout the petitioner’s life thereafter.

3. The first certificate of disability was issued on 22.10.1998, certifying petitioner’s disability to the extent of 55 per cent. The next certificate containing consistent certification of the same disability and to the same extent is dated 20.11.2004. Both certificates are issued by the District Hospital, Howrah. The second certificate dated 20.11.2004 was issued by a board of four doctors when the petitioner was ten years of age.

4. After the petitioner crossed 20 years of age, the third certificate also certified the petitioner’s disability and its extent (55 per cent). The same was issued on 06.09.2014, and is bearing certificate serial No. DHH/1058/14, issued as per instructions issued by the Government of India, in the Ministry of Welfare, in this regard vide Memo No. 4-2/83 III dt. 06.08.1986 by a Board consisting of Chairman and three members.

5. The writ petitioner completed a Diploma Course in Ayurvedic Pharmacy and registered himself as Ayurvedic Pharmacist in Paschim Banga Ayurved Parishad (hereinafter in short referred to as PBAP). Being possessed with such qualification the petitioner applied in response to an advertisement issued by the West Bengal Health Recruitment Board (hereinafter in short referred to as the Recruitment Board) vide notification dated 15.03.2023 (Memo No. 432/HFW- 53024/14/2023-HRB), inviting applications for recruitment of Ayurvedic Pharmacists in the Department of Health and Family welfare, AYUSH Branch.

6. The petitioner participated in the recruitment process and his name figured in the overall performance list of eligible candidates as a selected candidate, against the sole (PWD) vacancy against general (Unreserved vacancy). The panel of selected candidates dated 16.10.2023 was valid for a period of one year.

7. Immediately after preparation of the Panel, a schedule for verification of documents was notified on 28.11.2023 wherein the petitioner’s name figured at Serial No. 31. The recommended candidates including the petitioner were thereafter by a Notification dated 02.02.2024, issued by the Special Secretary, (AYUSH) Health & Family welfare Department to the Government of West Bengal, asked to participate in the counselling procedure.

8. Upon completion of the entire exercise the petitioner was required to undergo medical examination pursuant to which “medical certificate of fitness” was to be issued in terms of the provisions contained in the WEST BENGAL SERVICE RULES (WBSR in short) Part 1. Such scrutiny of medical fitness is contemplated at the threshold of an appointment to ascertain whether the person is fit to perform the duties.

9. It is at this juncture that writ petitioner’s candidature was cancelled by an order dated 04.03.2024, issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top