Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been listed for hearing on office objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition. An objection has been raised by the Registry that the writ petition filed against the order passed by the Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, should have been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and not under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh on 17.7.2015 allowing the review application filed by the State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that the writ petition having been preferred against an order passed by the authority exercising power of judicial review but not being a civil Court, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has rightly been filed. He would further submit that it is the right of the petitioner to elect or choose a remedy against the order of subordinate Court or Tribunal i.e. whether to file petition under Article 226 or under Article 227 or both under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, therefore, it is not in the domain of the Registry to dir