SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RAJANI DUBEY, JJ.
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Chowki Chikhali, Aarakshi Kendra City Kotwali, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) & Ors. - Applicants
Versus
Shekhar Korram, S/o. Shri Gend Singh Korram & Ors. - Non-applicants
Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2021 and Criminal Appeal No.1270 of 2021
Decided On : 13-06-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Ms. Prachi Mishra, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Sudeep Verma, Deputy Govt. Advocate.
For the Non-applicant : Mr. Saurabh Dangi and Ms. Aditi Singhvi.

Headnote:

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012- Section 6 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 363, 366, 302 - Offence of murder – Kidnapping – Charged - Minor daughter aged about 3 years 6 months went missing and on that basis, Crime Nowas recorded for offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC vide Ex.P-38 by Police Outpost Chikhli, District Rajnandgaon and on same day Police Outpost Chikhli has prepared a missing panchnama questionnaires under the prescribed format on the basis of complaint made by Omprakash vide Ex.P-2 - First information report registered - During investigation, the appellant was apprehended and he confessed to have abducted deceased minor victim and thereafter committed sexual assault upon her and then killed her by smothering - Whether death of deceased was homicidal in nature, as trial Court has held the death to be homicidal in nature and appellant was last seen together with the deceased – Held, Though it shocks the conscious of the society at large, but, yet, in facts and circumstances of case, considering young age of appellant, upon thoughtful consideration, Court are of the view that extreme sentence of death penalty is not warranted in facts and circumstances of case – Court are of opinion that this is not rarest of rare case in which major penalty of sentence of death awarded has to be confirmed - In Court view, imprisonment for life would be completely adequate and would meet the ends of justice - Accordingly, Court direct commutation of death sentence into imprisonment for life – Court further direct that life sentence must extend to the imprisonment for remainder of natural life of appellant - Consequently, Cr.Ref.No.made by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court – POCSO), to extent of confirmation of imposition of death sentence to appellant Shekhar Korram is rejected accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. The appellant herein namely Shekhar Korram has been awarded with death sentence by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court – POCSO), Rajnandgaon in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No.50/2020 vide judgment dated 13-9-2021 after having found him guilty for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 302 of the IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the POCSO Act’) and also under Section 201 of the IPC. He has been sentenced to death by hanging under sub-section (5) of Section 354 of the CrPC. Conviction and sentences imposed upon the appellant are as follows:-

Conviction

Sentence

Section 363 of the IPC

RI for seven years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, additional RI for one year

Section 366 of the IPC

RI for ten years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, additional RI for one year

Section 302 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act

Death sentence (to be hanged till death)

Section 201 of the IPC

RI for seven years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, additional RI for one year

2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge in exercise of power conferred under Section 366 of the CrPC after passing the sentence of death submitted the proceedings to this Court for its confirmation and this is how this death reference is before us for consideration along with the appeal preferred by the accused / appellant herein being Cr.A. No.1270/2021.

3. The prosecution case as unfolded during the course of trial is as under: -

Admitted facts / prosecution case, in brief: -

3.1 Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 22-8-2020 Omprakash @ Prakash Yadav (PW-1) lodged a complaint in Police Outpost Chikhli, Police Station City Kotwali, Rajnandgaon that his minor daughter aged about 3 years 6 months went missing and on that basis, Crime No.0/2020 was recorded for the offence punishable under Section 363 of the IPC vide Ex.P-38 by Police Outpost Chikhli, District Rajnandgaon and on the same day i.e. 22-8-2020, Police Outpost Chikhli has prepared a missing panchnama questionnaires under the prescribed format on the basis of the complaint made by Omprakash vide Ex.P-2. The first information report registered as Crime No.0/2020 (Ex.P-38) in Police Outpost Chikhli was later on transferred to Police Station City Kotwali, Rajnandgaon and registered as Crime No.382/2020 vide Ex.P-10. on the same day, i.e. 22-8-2020 at about 23:25 hours, information regarding murder of the missing minor girl has been received by the police and the police reached to the crime spot and prepared dehati morgue intimation vide Ex.P-11. The police also prepared morgue intimation regarding murder of minor girl vide Ex.P-39 and thereafter, took up the matter for investigation and prepared naksha panchnama of the crime spot vide Ex.P-4.

3.2 During investigation, the appellant was apprehended and he confessed to have abducted the deceased minor victim and thereafter committed sexual assault upon her and then killed her by smothering. The police on suspicion and on information given by Narad Sinha (PW-2) and Bhuneshwari (PW-10), arrested the appellant / accused and recorded his memorandum statement under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act in shape of Ex.P-14. Pursuant to the memorandum disclosure statement of the appellant / accused, dead body of the deceased victim and pillow cover used in the crime were recovered vide Exs.P-15 & P-16. Further, underwear of the accused was also seized at his instance vide Ex.P-17. Pursuant to the memorandum statement of the appellant / accused, dead body of the deceased minor girl was recovered from the house of the appellant / accused on being disclosed by the accused / appellant and dead body was identified by her father Omprakash (PW-1) vide dead body identification panchnama Ex.P-5. Thereafter,




































                                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                    1
                                    2
                                    3
                                    4
                                    5
                                    6
                                    7
                                    8
                                    9
                                    10
                                    11
                                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                    supreme today icon
                                    logo-black

                                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                    Please visit our Training & Support
                                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                    qr

                                    Scan Me!

                                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                    whatsapp-icon Back to top