NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Ramawtaar Goenka S/o Late Kanhaiyalal Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Bajrang Lohiya S/o Late R. K. Lohiya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
1. Heard on admission.
2. The second appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the C.P.C. against judgment and decree dated 23.07.2008 passed by Eighth Additional District Judge (F.T.C.) Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. 25-A/2008 (Bajrang Lohiya vs. Ramawtaar and Another) reversing the judgment and decree passed by Seventh Civil Judge Class-II, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 145A/2006 on 01.08.2007, which has been filed by the plaintiff for declaring document dated 30.01.1989 as forged, null and void document.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their status in Civil Suit No. 145A/2006 which was filed for declaring the document forged.
4. The brief facts, as reflected from the plaint averments, are that the plaintiff has filed a civil suit mainly contending that the State Government has constituted Bilaspur Development Authority, who used to develop residential and commercial areas after dividing into various plots as per various schemes floated by them. As per the scheme, Bilaspur Development Authority has floated the scheme to develop plot area about 118 acre land of commercia
Krishna Mohan Kul @ Nani Charan Kul and Another vs. Pratima Maity and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.