IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Arup Kumar Goswami, Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ.
Bhaskar Dewangan S/o Late Shri Dukhu Ram and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Excise Department and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 140 of 2021
Decided On : 06-09-2022
Liquor Shops - Public Interest Litigation - Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, Section 17(3)(a), Chhattisgarh Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020 - The court discussed the provisions of Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, Section 17(3)(a) and the Chhattisgarh Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020, which regulate the sale of liquor and the permissible distance of liquor vends from highways. The court also referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts in similar cases to interpret the legal provisions and their applicability to the present case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, an advocate and a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking the removal of liquor shops from a specific location near schools and temples, citing violation of guidelines issued by the Supreme Court. The State-respondents argued that the liquor shops were within municipal areas and did not violate the relevant statutes and notifications.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the liquor shops were located within municipal areas and therefore did not violate the guidelines of the Supreme Court or the relevant statutes. The court dismissed the application, stating that there was no merit in the petition.
Issues: Violation of guidelines regarding the permissible distance of liquor vends from highways, applicability of relevant statutes and notifications, and the location of the liquor shops within municipal areas.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, Section 17(3)(a), and the Chhattisgarh Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020, along with the judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts in similar cases to determine the legality of the location of the liquor shops.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the application, stating that there was no merit in the petition.
ORDER :
Arup Kumar Goswami, J.
Heard Mr. Punit Ruparel, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for respondents No.1 to 6.
2. This Public Interest Litigation is filed by an Advocate, who is petitioner No.1 and a Journalist, who is petitioner No.2, seeking a direction to remove the liquor shops, “Deshi” and “English”, from Kukdur Road, State Highway No.9 near Saraswati Shishu Mandir, Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh and to quash an order dated 25.07.2021 passed by the Collector (Excise), District Kabirdham.
3. It is pleaded in the writ petition that the location of the liquor shops are within the prohibited distance from the State Highway and thus, had violated the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is also pleaded at paragraph 8.3 that the Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Pandariya, Saraswati Shishu Mandir Higher Secondary School, Pandariya, Post Metric Girls Hostel, Community Health Centre and Girls Middle School are situated within the vicinity of 250 metres, 100 metres, 200 metres, 400 metres and 300 metres, respectively. There is one Hanuman Temple in the Forest Colony, which is located at a distance of 300 metres; Ravidas Mandir and Shani Mandir and Parmeshwari Devi Bhawan are situated within the vicinity of 400 metres. Though the school authorities, ward members and local persons had submitted representation against opening of the liquor shops at Kukdur Road, the same was not considered favourably.
4. The petitioners had earlier filed Writ Petition (PIL) No.59 of 2021, which, however, was allowed to be withdrawn by an order dated 22.09.2021 because of the subsequent developments with liberty to file afresh.
5. It is stated that Deshi and English liquor shops are situated 60 metres away from State Highway No.9 and they are running on rental buildings. It is stated in paragraph 8.8 that both liquor shops are situated at Kukdur Road. At paragraph 8.7 it is stated that by order dated 25.07.2021, they were allowed to be opened.
6. Perusal of the order dated 25.07.2021, goes to show that Deshi (Country) liquor shop, Pandariya was shifted to Kui Road, Nawapar, Ward No.13, Pandariya and English (Foreign) liquor shop, Pandariya was shifted to Kukdur Road, B.N. Fules, Pandariya. It will be appropriate to reproduce the order dated 25.07.2021:
No./AAB/theka/20211735A
Kabirdham Dated 25/07/2021
Country liquor shop, Pandariya (First) is being operated in financial year 2021-22 in the building owned by Mr. Brij Vilas Soni and Foreign liquor shop, Pandariya (Second) is being operated in the Government building. Due to public opposition in the presently operated building, tender process is being issued for the new shop building, according to which the Sub committee has approved the new shop in the building/shop owned by Mr. Sandeep Sahu for the Country liquor shop, Pandariya (First) and a new shop in the building/shop owned by Mr. Suryakant Pandey for Foreign liquor shop, Pandariya (Second). According to the report of the Circle Officer, the new proposed site for Country liquor shop, Pandariya (First) and Foreign liquor shop, Pandariya (Second), is a non-objectionable place according to rule 1 of the General License rules.
Thus, according to the Section 62 (2) (h)(k)and(l) and as per the provision given in the General License condition, No. 5, the transfer of site of the Country liquor shop, Pandariya (First) is approved for the newly proposed site at Kui Road Navapara Ward, No 13 Pandariya in the building of Sandeep Sahu and the transfer of site of the Foreign liquor shop, Pandariya (Second), is approved for the newly proposed site at Kukdur Road, B.N. Fuels near Pandariya in the building of Mr. Suryakant Pandey.
This order will come into force with immediate effect.
Sd/-
Illegible Collector
District Kabirdham
(C.G.)
Kabirdham
Dated : 25.07.2021”
7. A reply-affidavit was filed by the State-respondents stating that in the light of the decision r
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, Section 17(3)(a), and the Chhattisgarh Excise (Amendm....
The court mandated removal of liquor shops within 500 meters of highways to uphold public safety and comply with Supreme Court directions.
The court mandates strict compliance with safety regulations prohibiting liquor shops within 500 meters of highways, reiterating that public safety must take precedence over revenue considerations.
Compliance with statutory distance regulations for liquor shops from sensitive establishments is essential for public health and must be enforced by state authorities.
Seeking cancellation of licence of - To obtain/get a licence of IMFL is not a matter of right.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.