SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2698

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, ANUROOP SINGHI, JJ.
Kanhaiya Lal Soni S/o Shri Mal Chand Soni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6324 of 2023
Decided On : 06-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Abhinav Jain
For the Respondents: Mahaveer Bishnoi, Harshwardhan Singh, Ravindra Jala, S.S. Ladrecha, Harsh Gupta, Pawan Singh Rathore

Compliance with statutory distance regulations for liquor shops from sensitive establishments is essential for public health and must be enforced by state authorities.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Excise Rules, 1956 - Rule 75 - High Court mandates adherence to statutory distance regulations for liquor shops from educational institutions, hospitals, and places of worship, as per Supreme Court directives - In light of these regulations, the Court emphasized public health and safety concerns. (Paras 6, 7, 10, 13)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - Local authorities are obligated to ensure compliance with legal mandates, particularly concerning public safety; failure to do so may lead to accountability measures against officials. (Paras 10, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought directives for the relocation of liquor shops violating statutory distance regulations from sensitive establishments. They highlighted ongoing non-compliance despite the Excise Rules and Supreme Court judgments.

Findings of Court:
The Excise authorities must rigorously enforce compliance with the location restrictions under Rule 75, ensuring public welfare.

Issues: The main question addressed was the enforcement of distance regulations for liquor shop locations in relation to public welfare.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that compliance with distance regulations is essential for public safety and must be strictly implemented by authorities, emphasizing their legal duty under existing statutes.

Result: Petition allowed; direct compliance with the discussed regulations mandated.

Table of Content
1. relief sought regarding liquor shop regulation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. supreme court directions on liquor shop restrictions. (Para 3 , 4)
3. violations of liquor shop location regulations noted. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. state responsibility for enforcement of liquor law. (Para 10 , 11)
5. order for compliance and accountability measures. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER :

1. The instant writ petition (PIL) has been preferred by the petitioners claiming the following reliefs :

"A) The Respondent State authorities be directed to shift/Locate all the Liquor shops in the City of Sujangarh 500 mtrs. vs. K. Balu & anr. and Judgment dated 20.03.2023 passed in Kanagachettikulam Makkal Podhunala Eyakkam vs. U.O.I. & Ors. and B). The Respondent State be directed to amend Rule 75 of the Rajasthan Excise Rule, 1956 in accordance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary Home, Prohibition and Excise Department and others Vs. K. Balu dated 15.12.2016 and reiterated in Kanagachettikulam Makkal Podhunala Eyakkam vs. U.O.I. & Ors. vide Judgment dated 20.03.2023: and C) Any other order or direction, which the Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts of the circumstances of the case be passed in favour of humble petitioners.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to Rule 75 of the Rajasthan Excise Rules, 1956, which reads as under :

"75. Location of shops –

(1) A licensee for the retail sale of Country Liquor, Foreign or Indian Made Foreign Liquor or hemp drugs shall have his shop only at a place approved by the District Excise Officer concerned.

(2) A shop for the retail sale of Country Liquors or Foreign or Indian Made Foreign Liquor shall not be located within a distance of 200 metres of Collegiate Educational Institution, Senior Higher Secondary School, Girls School of any standard, Hospital, Place of Worship or Place of Public Entertainment, a Factory or a Labour or Harijan Colony.

(3) A retail shop shall not be shifted from one place to another but if a licensee desires to change already approved location of the shop, same may be allowed by the District Excise Officer concerned on such conditions and fees as determined by the Excise Commissioner from time to time (4) The District Excise Officer, with sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing, shall have the powers to shift a shop from one place to another and no compensation shall be given to the licensee for such shifting of a shop.

Provided that the Excise Commissioner may grant relaxation in the above conditions of location of a Liquor shop in exceptional circumstances after recording sufficient reasons in writing for doing so.

(5) A shop for the retail sale of country liquor, Foreign liquor and Indian Made Foreign Liquor, beer or Hemp Drugs shall not be located within a distance of 150 meters on both sides from the Centre of National or State High ways. But this condition shall not apply in areas falling within the jurisdiction of Municipal Corporation/ Municipal Council/ Municipality or where a developed market at a distance specified by Public Works Department is located.

Explanations-

(1) For the purpose of sub-Rule (2) of Rule 75 , the restriction about the distance of a shop from a "Place of Worship" in the cities having a population of more than one lac shall only be applicable in respect of those places of worship entered in the list maintained in the Office of District Excise Officer.

(2) Harijan Colony shall mean a Municipal Ward, in which population of Person belonging to Scheduled Castes according to the latest census exceeds fifty percent of the total population of that ward, (3) Any shop situated near an Educational Institution other than a College or Senior Higher Secondary School level Institutions or girls school of any standard shall be opened only at least one hour after the closing time of that institution.

(4) for the purpose of sub-rule (2) of Rule 75 "Place of Public En

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top