IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOUTAM BHADURI, N.K. CHANDRAVANSHI, JJ.
ABIS Exports India Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Mr. Gunjam Nalode - Respondent
MA No. 101 of 2022
Decided On : 19-12-2022
Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Order 39 - Rule 1 & 2 - Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Companies Act - Trade marks - Engaged in business of manufacturing and selling - Grant of interim relief - Appellant/plaintiff ABIS Exports India Private Limited claiming itself to be a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act stated that they are engaged in business of manufacturing and selling livestock feed, poultry products, FMCG products, edible oil, dairy products and allied range of products and also runs chain of restaurants under well known ABIS Marks - Company was incorporated in year 1985 by four brothers and according to their first alphabet names ABIS was established appellant and sister concerns are also engaged in Indian Agro and Food Industries and working under the company brand name ABIS - Product manufactured by appellant bearing trademark ABIS is being used continuously and extensively since 1998 - It has various offices in State of Chhattisgarh and more than 10,000/- employees working in the offices located at Rajnandgaon, Raipur and Hyderabad, etc. and over a period of time they have received a tremendous response from market, traders and general public and thereby acquired goodwill and reputation over period of time - Held, In instant case, prima facie, it is manifest that both products are entirely different - Product claimed by appellant is in different category and it cannot be covered by a blanket monopoly to term it as a passing off - Even when no screen shots have been placed by appellant to compare with range of products then we are unable to appreciate how it is going to confuse in respect of domain name - In fact, appellant is using domain name www.ibgroup.co. in whereas the respondent is using the domain name of www.abisgold.com - Prima facie, reading of domain names of both parties appear that they are different. On comparison of the domain name, it does not show that it would cause any deceptive or confusion in the mind of a purchaser who normally would be an intelligent one while dealing with the internet purchase - Further class of purchasers/consumers is also different - Appellant is unable to, prima facie, prove that respondent has used their domain name - Consequently, balance of inconvenience and irreparable loss do not lie in favour of appellant as the sale of detergent cake by respondent may not suffer any loss to business of appellant i.e. livestock product, etc - appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Goutam Bhaduri, J.
1. The instant miscellaneous appeal filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the order dated 19.10.2022 passed by the Judge, Commercial Court (District Level), Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh in Commercial Suit Class-A/3/2022, whereby the application (I.A. No.1/2022) for grant of interim relief filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC has been dismissed.
2. The appellant/plaintiff ABIS Exports India Private Limited claiming itself to be a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act stated that :-
- they are engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling livestock feed, poultry products, FMCG products, edible oil, dairy products and allied range of products and also runs chain of restaurants under the well known ABIS Marks;
- the company was incorporated in the year 1985 by four brothers namely Amir Ali, Bahadur Ali, Iqbal Ali and Sultan Ali and according to their first alphabet names ABIS was established;
- the appellant and sister concerns are also engaged in Indian Agro and Food Industries and working under the company brand name ABIS;
- the product manufactured by the appellant bearing trademark ABIS is being used continuously and extensively since 1998;
- it has various offices in the State of Chhattisgarh and more than 10,000/- employees working in the offices located at Rajnandgaon, Raipur and Hyderabad, etc. and over a period of time they have received a tremendous response from the market, traders and the general public and thereby acquired goodwill and reputation over the period of time;
- with the passage of time they diversified its business in various fields i.e. manufacturing, distributing, importing, exporting, stocking, marketing and selling of various livestock feeds including poultry, fish and shrimp, poultry and dairy products, edible oil and allied range of FMCG products under the name ABIS Gold, ABIS Feed, ABIS Rice, ABIS SHRIMP, ABIS Grower, ABIS Brooder, ABIS Starter, ABIS Finisher, ABIS Silver, ABIS Rice Plus, ABIS Star, ABIS Soya Power, ABIS Star Soya, ABIS Acustar, ABIS Laziz, ABIS Soya DOC and ABIS Dairy;
- the company is also registered as ABIS Trademark. According to the appellant, apart from poultry, livestock feed and dairy products by adopting and using labels in respect of its ABIS range of products and services, one of its flagship products, being soya bean oil is manufactured and sold by the appellant under the mark ABIS Gold and the same is being sold by the appellant since 2007;
- the appellant through its in-house designer have designed a new artwork/packaging/trade dress for the said goods bearing the trademark ABIS Gold under the ABIS Label and was being used openly, continuously and extensively with a view to distinguish its goods from those of others;
- the appellant has also spent substantial amount of money on publicity, advertisement and sales promotion as also on research and development to popularize the said ABIS marks, ABIS label and the goods and services offered thereunder;
- the appellant spent considerable amount on advertising and promotional initiatives and for the financial year 2021-22 the sales of the appellant was to the tune of Rs.636.18 crores (approx.) and appellant had posted on the domain name www.ibgroup.co. in which is accessible to public from any part of the world;
- the appellant also offers the product in the e-commerce platform and portals and the soyabean oil under the product ABIS Gold is being sold to different purchasers and therefore, is a well known trademark under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1999');
- the appellant alleged that in the year 2021 the appellant found that the respondent was manufacturing and marketing products i.e. detergent cake/ washing powder &soap/hand wash/dish wash/toilet cleaners/bleaching substances under the infringement trade mark ABIS Gold, which is identical and deceptively similar to the product of the appellant ABIS label;
- having came to know abou
Laxmikant V. Patel Vs. Chetanbhai Shah and another
Satyam Infoway Ltd. Vs. Siffynet Solutions (P) Ltd.
Mahendra & Mahendra Paper Mills Ltd. vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd. and another v. Sudhir Bhatia & others
Vishnudas Trading as Vishnudas Kishendas vs. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd., Hyderabad and Another
SupremeToday
The court found that despite phonetic similarity, the distinctiveness of trade marks and differences in intended consumer bases negate the likelihood of confusion and passing off.
Point of Law : Section 27 of Trade Marks Act provides that no action for infringement will lie in respect of an unregistered trade mark.
The principle of prior user of a trademark prevails over subsequent registrations, especially when confusion or association is likely between goods and services of similar trade sectors.
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks and prevention of passing off, based on prior adoption, continuous commercial user, goodwill, and deceptive similarity....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.