IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, Sanjay K. Agrawal, JJ.
Veersingh S/o Khunkhun Nishad and ors. (In Jail) – Appellants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through D.M. Raigarh (CG) - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 503 of 2016
Decided On : 18-04-2023
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 161 and 374(2) - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302/34 - Offence of Murder - Appeal against conviction - Whether accused-appellants herein are perpetrator of crime - Held, as per evidence of eyewitness incident appellants came to the deceased who was working on his agricultural field at that time some quarrel took place between them then out of anger and on sudden quarrel appellants assaulted by spade by which he received grievous injuries and died after three days of incident - There was no premeditation on part of the appellants to cause death of deceased and only because of land dispute quarrel took place between appellants & the deceased and out of that anger and in heat of passion appellants assaulted by spade by which he died - Appeal Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. This criminal appeal filed by the appellants-accused under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.2.2016, passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Raigarh in Sessions Trial No.24/2014, whereby the appellants-accused have been convicted for offence under Section 302/34 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for 5 months to each of the appellants.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that deceased Kartikram had land dispute with his brothers namely, Veersingh and Harinath Singh (appellants herein) and on account of that, the appellants always threatened to deceased Kartikram to cause death. On 7.9.2014 at about 5-5.30 p.m. the appellants assaulted Kartikram by spade in Bahara field at village Jatari by which he sustained grievous injuries. Receiving the information about incident, Teejkumar (PW-1), nephew of the appellants and the deceased, reached to the spot whom Kartikram narrated the incident. Thereafter with the help of other persons, Kartikram was admitted to K.G. Hospital, Raigarh and thereafter he was shifted to Shree Balaji Superspeciality Hospital, Mowa, Raipur, where he died on 11.9.2014. Teejkumar (PW-1) lodged dehati nalishi on 8.9.2014 at about 15.45 p.m. vide Ex.P-1 and on the basis of dehati nalishi, FIR (Ex.P-14) was registered against appellant No.1-Veersingh for offence under Section 307 of the IPC, but later on, on the basis of story developed by the complainant when Kartikram succumbed to the injuries on 11.9.2014, name of appellant No.2-Harinath Singh has been implicated in the same crime as he was also involved in commission of offence. Dead body of the deceased was sent for postmortem to Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Raipur, where Dr.S.K.Bagh (PW-10) conducted postmortem over the body of the deceased vide Ex.P-9 and found following injuries:-
INJURY:- HEAD:- Incised looking lacerated wound with stitches present on right side parietal to vertex region 12 c.m. long on cutting stitches, brain matter coming out on opening scalp. Dark and black ecchymosis present on right parietal, frontal and left parito frontal region diffusely.
Dr.S.K.Bagh (PW-10) opined that cause of death was due to cardiorespiratory failure as a result of head injuries and death was homicidal in nature. Inquest was prepared vide Ex.P-3. Spade was seized from village Puslada at the instance of Teejkumar (PW-1) vide Ex.P-4. Appellant-Veersingh was arrested on 13.9.2014 vide arrest memo Ex.P-18 and appellant-Harinath Singh was arrested on 16.9.2014 vide arrest memo Ex.P-19.
3. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. Bloodstains clothes of appellant No.1-Veersingh, bloodstains clothes of the deceased and spade were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory for examination, however, FSL report has not been received till date. After due investigation, the police filed charge-sheet in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raigarh, who in turn, committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Raigarh, from where the First Additional Sessions Judge, Raigarh received the case on transfer for trial. The appellants/accused abjured their guilt and entered into defence that they have not committed any offence and they have falsely been implicated in crime in question.
4. In order to bring home the offence, the prosecution examined as many as 14 witnesses and exhibited 21 documents. The appellants-accused examined none in their defence, however, exhibited Exs.D/1 & D/2 in support of their case.
5. The trial Court upon appreciation of oral and documentary evidence
Arjun v. State of Chhattisgarh
Gurmukh Singh v. State of Haryana (2009) 15 SCC 635
Rambir v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Exception 4 to Section 300 of the IPC and the conversion of the appellant's conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part-I of....
The main legal point established is the requirement to prove the meeting of minds and fusion of ideas among the accused for the application of Section 34 of IPC, and the consideration of the nature o....
The court altered the conviction from murder under Section 302 to culpable homicide under Section 304 Part-II, emphasizing the absence of premeditation and the nature of the incident as a sudden figh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.