RAMESH SINHA
Tularam Bhatpahri, S/o Late Latel Ram Bhatpahri – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr.Manoj Paranjape and Mr.Shreyansh Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Avinash Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.
2. By way of this petition under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:-
3. Petitioner No.1-Tularam Bhatpahri is holding the substantive post of In-charge Headmaster and is posted at Middle School, Rachkatti, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Gariyaband. Petitioner No.2-Ajay Kumar Yadav is holding the substantive post of Teacher Panchayat and is posted at Middle School Rachkatti, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Gariyaband and petitioner No.3-Faneshwar Kumar Sahu is holding the substantive post of Teacher Panchayat and is posted at Middle School Rachkatti, Tahsil Gariyaband, Dis
Kurban Hussein Mohamedali Rangawalla v. State of Maharashtra
Suleman Rahiman Mulani v. State of Maharashtra
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Sushil Ansal v. State through Central Bureau of Investigation
A direct nexus between the accused's negligent act and the death must be established for liability under Section 304-A IPC.
A driver cannot be held criminally liable for an accident caused by an unforeseen event without evidence of negligent or rash conduct. The absence of mens rea precludes criminal liability under IPC s....
The commission of a 'rash and/or negligent act' is a necessary ingredient for the offences punishable under Sections 279/304A IPC. The court emphasized the importance of establishing gross negligence....
Negligence and rashness must be proven beyond reasonable doubt for conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC; mere involvement in an accident does not equate to guilt.
Point of Law : High Court may exercise the powers under Section 226 of Constitution or the inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of Court or otherwise to secure the....
Liability for negligence in criminal cases requires clear evidence of gross negligence; merely failing to take additional precautions beyond established protocols is insufficient for criminal charges....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or incitement by the accused, which was not present in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.