IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, N.K.CHANDRAVANSHI, JJ.
Satauram Mandavi S/o Aayturam Mandavi – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2022
Decided on : 05-09-2023
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 5(m), 6, 4, 42 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 376, (3), AB - Offence of rape – Appeal against conviction - Appellant lured prosecutrix who is a minor girl and took her to his house and committed rape upon her – Held, Appellant has also not stated anything concrete in his defence except that he does not know and that he has been falsely implicated - Chain of circumstances is complete and leads only to one conclusion that it was accused/appellant who caused death of deceased and he alone committed murder of deceased - View taken by learned trial Court that appellant is author of crime is a pure finding of fact based on evidence available on record and court is of opinion that in present case, only view possible was one taken by trial Court – Court is of considered opinion that prosecution has been successful in proving its case beyond reasonable doubt and learned trial Court has not committed any legal or factual error in arriving at finding with regard to guilt of appellant/convict – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. questioning the impugned judgment dated 30.11.2021 passed in POCSO Case No. 25/2019 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Kondagaon, District Kondagaon has convicted the appellant under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, the POCSO Act, 2012) and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year.
2. Case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 26.06.2019, the appellant lured the prosecutrix who is a minor girl aged about 5 years and took her to his house and committed rape upon her.
3. The first information report (for short, the FIR), (Exhibit P/5) was lodged by the father of the prosecutrix namely Mansai Markam (PW-3) at Police Station, Vishrampuri, District Kondagaon, on 26.06.2019 at 11:00 hours. The said FIR was registered by Sunita Uikey (PW-9) Assistant Sub Inspector, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the IPC) and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
4. In the FIR, it was alleged by the complainant-Mansai Markam (PW-3) that he is a resident of Aamgaon, Police Station Bishrampuri. On 20.05.2019, there was a marriage function in their village where he had gone. Her wife Neeta Markam, mother-Dashoda Bai and his both children were at home. Her elder daughter (prosecutrix) aged about 5 years, was playing outside the house. At 11 a.m., when her wife did not find the prosecutrix at home, she went to the house of the appellant. She asked the appellant as to what he was doing with her daughter, the appellant wore his clothes and ran away. Thereafter, her daughter came out of the house after wearing her undergarments. She brought the prosecutrix to her house. The prosecutrix was suffering from fever for a week and complained of pain in her private part. The said incident was informed by Neeta Markam (PW-1) to him and thereafter, the complainant informed about the same to his brother Mansha Ram and sister-in-law (Bhabhi) Fulma Markam (PW- 5) and thereafter, the report was lodged on 26.06.2019. It was specifically alleged that the appellant had committed rape upon the prosecutrix.
5. After investigating the matter, the police submitted the police report alongwith charge-sheet against the appellant/convict under section 376, 376(3) IPC and Section 4, 5(m) / 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 before the learned Special Judge (FTC) Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, and the case was registered as POCSO Case No. 25/2019.
6. The learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charge on 06.09.2019 charging the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 376AB of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
7. Amongst others, the prosecution has filed the following documents in support of its case:
• Consent letter (Exhibit P/1)
• Crime details form(Exhibit P/2)
• Property seizure memo(Exhibit P/3)
• Written complaint (Exhibit P/4)
• First Information Report (Exhibit P/5)
• Consent letter (Exhibit P/6)
• Birth Certificate (Exhibit P/7)
• Property seizure memo (Exhibit P/8)
• MLC report of sexual violence (Exhibit P/9)
• Query report of seized undergarment(Exhibit P/10)
• MLC report of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/11)
• Application for MLC of appellant alongwith report (Exhibit P/12)
• Query report of seized undergarment of appellant (Exhibit P/13)
• Property seizure memo (Exhibit P/14)
• Arrest memo (Exhibit P/15)
• Arrest information (Exhibit P/16)
• Memo regarding preparation of spot map (Exhibit P/17)
• Memo to Chief Judicial Magistrate regarding recording of statement of prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Exhibit P/18)
• Property seizure memo (Exhibit P/19)
• Memo for query of seized undergarment of prosecutrix (Exhibit P/20)
• Memo for query of seized undergarment of appellant (Exhibit P/21)
• Memo to Chief Medical Officer appointing a female Doctor and medical examination of prosecutri
The judgment establishes the importance of proving the victim's age in cases of sexual offenses against minors and highlights the legal provisions under the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code for de....
The court affirmed that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence.
The sole testimony of a victim in sexual assault cases can suffice for conviction if credible, emphasizing stringent punishment under the POCSO Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict application of the POCSO Act and IPC provisions to convict the appellant for sexually assaulting a minor girl below 12 years of age. The....
The burden of proof under Sec. 29 of the POCSO Act, consistency of evidence, and the applicability of relevant sections of the POCSO Act and IPC in cases of sexual offenses against minors.
The victim's testimony in sexual assault cases should be weighed on reliability rather than strict corroboration, reflecting the trauma and context of the crime.
The victim's testimony in sexual assault cases is entitled to great weight, and corroboration is not essential for conviction. The court must be sensitive and careful in evaluating the evidence, and ....
The consent of a minor girl in case of sexual intercourse is immaterial and amounts to rape.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.