SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 533

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, C.J., Bibhu Datta Guru, J.
Vipin Kumar Jangde S/o Jagjeevan Jangde - Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Station House Officer - Respondent
CRA No. 976 of 2021
Decided On : 31-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni and Ms. Itu Rani Mukherjee, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer

The victim's testimony in sexual assault cases should be weighed on reliability rather than strict corroboration, reflecting the trauma and context of the crime.

Headnote:1. Statute Analysis: The court evaluated the offences under Sections 376-D, 323, 34, 506(b) of the IPC and the POCSO Act. Facts of the Case: The victim, aged 16, was raped by the appellants on 18/11/2017. The court found ample evidence through witness testimonies and medical reports confirming the crime.

Findings of Court:
The lower court's conviction was upheld as the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. 2.

Issues: The court considered whether the accused committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault.

Ratio Decidendi: It held that reliance on the victim's testimony, even without additional corroboration, is justifiable if the evidence is coherent and consistent. 3.

Result: The conviction and sentence as awarded by the trial court to the appellants is hereby upheld. The present criminal appeal lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the incidents leading to the appeal including prosecution's claims. (Para 1 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments of the appellants relating to inconsistencies in victim's testimony. (Para 8 , 9 , 30)
3. court assessed testimonies and medical evidence establishing the occurrence of the crime. (Para 20 , 24 , 25 , 34)
4. final assessment confirming that the conviction was justified and evidence was sufficient. (Para 26 , 46)
5. final ruling upholding the conviction. (Para 47)

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, CJ.

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.02.2021 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bilaspur (C.G.) in Special Criminal Case (POCSO Act) No. 140/2017, whereby the appellants have been convicted as under:-

Conviction under SectionSentence (Rigorous imprisonment)FineIn default of payment of fine add. imprisonment
Section 376D of the IPC20 yearsRs. 10,000/-06 months
Section 323 , 34 of the IPC1 yearRs.1,000/-01 month
Section 506(b) of the IPC2 yearRs. 1,000/-01 month
All sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the victim lives with her family in village x and studies in class VIII. At the time of the incident, the victim's parents had gone to a brick kiln in Uttar Pradesh to earn a living. At that time, the victim lived at home with her elder sister and brothers. On the night of 18/11/2017 at 08:00 pm, the victim entered the toilet room in the courtyard of her house to defecate, when both the accused Vipin and Sunil caught hold of the victim. Accused Vipin gagged the victim's mouth, then tied her mouth with a handkerchief and her legs with a cloth. Both the accused beat the victim and threatened her with a knife. After this, accused Vipin removed her undergarment (panty) and also removed his underwear and inserted his penis in her urination area. After that, accused Sunil also removed his underwear and inserted it in her urination area. Then hearing the sound of the door, victim’s brother and sister shouted, then the accused Vipin and Sunil opened the door and ran away. Hearing the noise, the neighbors also came to the house. The victim told her neighbour and her siblings about the incident and went to Malhar police post and filed a report about the incident. On the report of the victim, a rural complaint (Ex.P-1) was registered by Malhar police post. The said unnumbered complaint was registered in Masturi police station as numbered Crime No. 493/17 under sections 376-D, 323, 506 IPC and section 4 of the POCSO Act as per First Information Report (Ex.P-17). The case was taken into investigation by Masturi police station.

3. During investigation by Sub Inspector Ram Naresh Gautam (PW 21), preparation of site map (Ex.P-2), preparation of examination form (Ex.P-26) for sending the victim to CHC Masturi for examination on 21/11/2017, preparation of examination form (Ex.P. 27) and (Ex.P-28) respectively for sending the accused to CHC Masturi for examination on 22/11/2017, preparation of examination form (Ex.P-29 and Ex.P-30) for getting the physical examination of the accused done on the same date 22/11/2017, taking of memorandum (Ex.P-20) of accused Vipin Jangde, seizure memo (Ex.P-3) for white colour shirt, black colour leggings, maroon colour under wear of the victim dated 21/11/2017 was seized, after examination of the victim, lady constable Meena Rathore (PW 18) brought the vaginal slide of the victim in a sealed packet given by the doctor and presented it as per Ex.P. 23, vegetable cutting knife was seized from accused Vipin Jangde as per Ex.P. 18, used handkerchief of dull colour and bamboo stick having three knots was seized from accused Sunil Kurre as per Ex.P. 19, one reddish brown colour under wear was seized from accused Sunil Kurre as per Ex.P. 21, one henna coloured under wear was seized from accused Vipin Jangde as per Ex.P. 22, statements of witnesses were recorded, the accused were arrested on 21/11/2017 as per arre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top