IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, C.J., SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT, J.
XYZ - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
CRA No. 375 of 2024
Decided on : 20-06-2024
POCSO Act - Conviction under Section 376AB of IPC and Section 5(m) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the appellant's appeal against the conviction under Section 376AB of the IPC and Section 5(m) read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act for sexually assaulting a minor girl below 12 years of age. The prosecution presented evidence of the victim's age, medical examination reports, witness statements, and forensic reports to establish the appellant's guilt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the victim was indeed a minor below the age of 12 years at the time of the incident and that the appellant had committed severe penetrative sexual assault on her. The court also rejected the appellant's plea of insanity under Section 84 of the IPC, as the evidence indicated that the appellant was not suffering from unsoundness of mind at the time of the offence.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the victim's age, the appellant's mental state, and the commission of the sexual assault. The court also considered the plea of double punishment and the applicability of relevant legal provisions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence of the victim's age, witness statements, medical reports, and forensic findings to establish the appellant's guilt. It also emphasized that the appellant's plea of insanity was not supported by the evidence. The court applied the principle of double punishment and exempted the appellant from the charges under Section 376AB of the IPC.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to serve out the sentence awarded by the trial Court.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) questioning the impugned judgment dated 31.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.S.C. (POCSO), Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No.71/2020, whereby the trial Court has convicted the appellant under Section 376AB of the Indian Penal Code, but not awarded sentence under this Section and also convicted under Section 5(m) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘the POCSO Act’) and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment till natural death with fine of Rs. 20,000/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 01 year.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 05.11.2020, at around 3.00 PM, the applicant i.e. the aunt of the victim (PW-03) was in her house. The applicant’s sister-in-law (jethani) i.e. the victim’s mother (PW-02) and the applicant’s brother-in-law (jeth) i.e. the victim’s father (PW-07) had gone to the fields. The children of applicant’s house U(N), victim, KMDR, PRTM, GJN, victim’s friend (PW-08) and other children were playing in the street and applicant/victim’s aunt was working inside the house. Then, all the children came to the house of the applicant and told her that the accused “D alias DN” has taken the victim to his house for long time and had locked the door from inside and had committed sexual intercourse with the victim, then victim’s aunt (PW-3) asked the elder sister of victim that where is the victim when she saw that the victim was standing near the door, she called the victim near her and asked her what had happened to which victim told her that accused had forcefully made intercourse with her. The applicant’s aunt then informed victim’s uncle (PW-06) about the incident and later in the evening, when victim’s parents came back from field, they were also told about the incident. Thereafter, victim’s father called elderly people of the village to his house and told them about the incident after which, the villager called a vehicle by dialing 112 and then, in the said vehicle, the village kotwar, victim’s father, her uncle and other people took her to District Hospital, Rajnandgaon for her treatment.
3. On giving information by the victim’s aunt (PW-03) at police outpost, District Hospital, Rajnandgaon about the accused taking the minor victim to his house and rape against her, on 05.11.2020, at about 23.40, dehati nalsi against the accused under section 376 of the IPC and Section 4, 6 of the POCSO Act was registered vide Ex.P-4. On 05.11.2020, permission from victim’s mother vide Ex.P-1 and from father vide Ex.P-8 were received for examination of victim’s genitals from the lady doctor and a memo vide Ex.P-17 was sent to District Hospital, Rajnandgaon for genital examination and to give report on the same day. On the same day, on producing the undergarment worn by the victim in front of the witnesses, the same was seized vide Ex.P-2. On 06.11.2020 on the basis of Dehati Nalsi, FIR was registered against the accused under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4, 6 of the POCSO Act at Crime No.205/2020 vide Ex.P-14. On 06.11.2020, an application (Ex.P-18) was sent by the District Hospital, Rajnandgaon to inform the result about the seized maroon colour undergarment of the victim after which, the same was received (Ex.P-29).
4. During the course of investigation, on 06.11.2020, the medical examination report (Ex.P-28) of the private parts of the victim was received from the female doctor and during the examination, 02 pieces of vaginal slides were prepared, sealed and given to lady constable Lileshwari Bhandari and the victim was referred to a gynecologist for expert opinion and further treatment. On 06.11.2020 itself, when lady constable No.69 Lileshwari Bhandari brought and presented 02 pieces of vagin
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict application of the POCSO Act and IPC provisions to convict the appellant for sexually assaulting a minor girl below 12 years of age. The....
The judgment establishes the importance of proving the victim's age in cases of sexual offenses against minors and highlights the legal provisions under the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code for de....
The court affirmed that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence.
The court affirmed the conviction for kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the importance of age determination and the reliability of victim testimony supported by medical evidence.
The sole testimony of a child victim can suffice for conviction if credible, and age determination must rely on conclusive evidence such as school records.
The judgment establishes that the testimony of a minor victim, supported by medical and documentary evidence, can be sufficient to establish guilt in cases of sexual offenses.
The consent of a minor is immaterial in cases of sexual offences, and any sexual act with a minor under the pretext of marriage constitutes rape under the IPC and the POCSO Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the critical appreciation of the victim's testimony in a sexual assault case, the burden of proof on the accused to establish the absence of culpab....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.