RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Munir Ahmed, S/o Late Sheikh Ahsanuddin Quadari – Appellant
Versus
Hemant Topkhanewale – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 23.07.2022 passed by the IIIrd Civil Judge Class-I, Raipur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 142-A/2016, parties being Munir Ahmed & Another Vs. Hemant Topkhanewale, whereby the application moved by the respondent/defendant under Section 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short as the 'CPC') has been allowed consequently, the proceedings of the Civil Suit No. 142- A/2016 have been stayed.
2. The facts of the present case are that earlier one Civil Suit No. 53A/2011 was filed by Hemant Topkhanewale for specific performance of contract and injunction against Anil Topkhanewale with regard to settlement No. 102, Survey No. 472, 494 and part of survey No. 495, total admeasuring 4830 sq. ft. situated at Village Khamarhdih, Patwari Circle No. 110, Revenue Circle Raipur, District Raipur. Defendant Anil Topkhanewale filed a written statement and after a full dressed trial, the IVh Additional District Judge, Raipur dismissed the suit filed by Hemant Topkhanewale vide judgment and decree on 20.06.2012. The plaintiff of that suit namely Hemant Topkhanewale preferred First Appeal No. 139/2012 against judgment and de
Aspi Jal and Another Vs. Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor
Dadolwa Samaylal Vs. Ramakant Ralakhan Brahmin reported in 2013 (4) MPLJ 614
Jugometal TRG Republica Vs. Rungta & Sons reported in AIR 1966 CAL 382
Karri Satyanarayana Vs. Pichika Veerraju reported in 1996 (1) ALT 177
Prakash Chand Soni Vs. Anita Jain reported in 2002 (2) MPLJ 121
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.