Prince @ Pinju, S/o Mahetaru Satnami vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Chh) 317

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL
Prince @ Pinju, S/o Mahetaru Satnami – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ali Asgar, Deputy Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. This criminal appeal preferred by the appellants herein under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.04.2015 passed in Sessions Trial No.50/2014 by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda-Bazar, District Baloda-Bazar, C.G., by which the appellants stand convicted & sentenced as under:-

Conviction	Sentence
Under Section 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘IPC’) for committing murder of Radheshyam	Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine additional rigorous imprisonment for six months
Under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC for committing murder of Ranichandrakali	Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine additional rigorous imprisonment for six months

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 06.05.2014 at about 6:00 pm, appellants assaulted Radheshyam and his wife Ranichandrakali (hereinafter called as 'deceased persons') with w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Chh) 317

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWALPrince @ Pinju, S/o Mahetaru Satnami – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL
Prince @ Pinju, S/o Mahetaru Satnami – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent