Santosh Yadav S/o Mangata Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Chh) 342

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Santosh Yadav S/o Mangata Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Manoj Paranjpe, Prasoon Agrawal.
For the Respondent: Sanjay Pathak.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.11.2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No. 102 of 2003 whereby, the learned Sessions Judge, convicted the appellants and sentenced them as under:

Name of appellant	Conviction	Sentence
Appellant No. 1 Santosh Yadav	Under Section 363 of Indian Penal Code, 1860	Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and fine of Rs. 50/- in default of payment of fine amount, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month.
Appellant No. 2 Chhotu @ Jai Singh	Under Section 363/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860	Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and fine of Rs. 50/- in default of payment of fine amount, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 31.01.2003, on the pretext of marriage, appellant No. 1-Santosh Yadav took the minor prosecutrix (PW-4) in a train from Durg Railway Station to the house of co-accused/Sagar at Tatanagar, in which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Chh) 342

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWALSantosh Yadav S/o Mangata Yadav – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Santosh Yadav S/o Mangata Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent