Dilharan Yadav, S/o Shri Shantilal Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Chh) 481

GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Dilharan Yadav, S/o Shri Shantilal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Shubham Tripathi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Panel Lawyer

JUDGMENT :

Goutam Bhaduri, J.

1. The instant appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) is preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.12.2019 passed by the Special Judge (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Korba, Chhattisgarh in Special Criminal Case No.39 of 2017, wherein the appellant has been convicted under Sections 363, 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act’) and sentenced as under :-

Conviction	Sentence
Under Section 363 of the IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 1 month.
Under Section 366 of the IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine, additional rigorous imprisonment for 4 months.
Under Section 4 of the POCSO Act	Rigorous imprisonment for 14 years and fine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Chh) 481

GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY KUMAR JAISWALDilharan Yadav, S/o Shri Shantilal Yadav – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Dilharan Yadav, S/o Shri Shantilal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent