IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
S.DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Ranjit Debroy alias Dundu S/o Late Ratish Debroy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA, J.
1. The appeal arises from the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 24.05.2023 passed by Ld. Special Judge (POCSO), North Tripura District, Dharmanagar in Special (POCSO) Case No. 46 of 2019.
2. By the impugned judgment and sentence, the appellant was convicted under Sections 448 and 354 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short ‘IPC’) and also under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short POCSO Act). Under Section 448 of IPC, he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and for both Section 354 of IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act, he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each for both the offences and in default of payment of fine, he was further directed to suffer imprisonment for one month on each count of sentences. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
3. The prosecution came up with the case that on 14/09/2019 victim (aged about 15 years) was sleeping alone in her house and at that time, the appellant entered there, forcefully laid on her and sexually abused her. Hearing her outcry, one neighbouring lady n
Rajkumar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors.
Phool Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
The credibility of victim testimony can sustain conviction in sexual assault cases, and an accused must prove age under POCSO to avoid liability.
The prosecution must establish the victim's age as below 18 years and provide corroborating evidence to prove charges under the POCSO Act.
The court affirmed a conviction under the POCSO Act based on the credible testimony of the victim, emphasizing that the absence of corroboration does not question the conviction if the victim's accou....
The conviction under the POCSO Act requires substantial evidence beyond mere suspicion; failure to prove such evidence necessitates acquittal.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the quality of evidence is essential in criminal law.
The court reaffirmed that in cases of sexual assault against minors, the victim's testimony holds significant weight, and corroborative evidence is essential but not always determinative. The legal f....
The court emphasized that the age of a victim must be proven with lawful evidence rather than relying on uncorroborated school records, rendering prior convictions based on inadequate evidence perver....
The competence of child witnesses, scrutiny of hostile witnesses' testimony, and the significance of corroborative evidence and the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act are central legal pri....
The reliability of the victim's testimony and the presumption under section 29 of the POCSO Act were crucial in establishing the accused's guilt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.