IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, SANJAY AGRAWAL, JJ.
Shimmer Singh Tandon D/o Pramod Tandon – Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 4841 of 2022
Decided On : 18-11-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Payment could not be received - Deprived off for registration - Petitioner is not challenging any particular order on part of respondent authorities, but due to technically fault, petitioner payment could not be received due to deprived off for registration of MPBS course in private college – Held, Petition is conspicuously silent on material facts - It is not indicated when she tried to register for counselling process - So-called complaint at Annexure P/4 is not dated and it is not even addressed to any authority - There is also no explanation why petitioner waited till 14.11.2022 - It is noticed that first round of counselling was over and allotment of seats on basis thereof was completed - Moreover, date of giving institutional preference for second round of counselling was also over - In admission process, there has to be some sanctity and time schedule as prescribed has to be adhered to as otherwise, it has potential to upset entire admission process - Writ petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Ravipal Maheshwari, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 3 as well as Ms. Anmol Sharma, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 2 and 4.
2. The petitioner appeared in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2022 (for short, the NEET) as a scheduled caste candidate.
3. In the petition, in paragraph 3 ‘Particulars of the order/cause against which the petition is made’ the petitioner states as follows:
4. In paragraph 8 ‘Facts of the case’ the petitioner states as follows:
8.2 That, the petitioner has passed minimum requisite qualification Higher Secondary in Biology subject. Copy of mark sheet of the Higher Secondary Education is being filed herewith as Annexure P-1.
8.3 That, the petitioner appeared for examination of National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (referred as to be NEET) (UG) 2022 and the petitioner obtained 140 marks in scheduled caste female category. Copy of score card is being filed herewith as Annexure P-2.
8.4 That, the respondent authorities allotted ID No. 1702040458 and its password Bhanu$2712 to the petitioner and thereafter, the petitioner attempted for counselling in CGDME 2022, but unfortunately the server did not perform properly and hold in payment platform, the petitioner again tried many time, but failed to pay due to technical fault, and hence the petitioner deprived for the counseling. Copy of documents showing registration is being filed herewith as Annexure P-3.
8.5 That, due to failing to deposit fee, the petitioner has made complaint through online but as per given instruction and attempted to call but given no. but no one received not responding. Copy of complaint made through online is being filed herewith collectively as Annexure P-4.
8.6 That, the respondent authorities published allotment sheet of MBBS in the years 2022 then its very clear the lower marks of the candidate has gone allotted to MBBS seat, whereas the petitioner has gone deprived off due to technical fault. Copy of relevant portion of allotment on MBBS seat obtained from online is being filed herewith as Annexure P-5. Hence this petition on the following facts and grounds amongst others.”
5. Accordingly, the petitioner has prayed for granting an opportunity to deposit the requisite fee for counselling process.
6. This petition was filed on 14.11.2022 and taken up for consideration on 17.11.2022. The following order was passed on 17.11.2022:
List this case tomorrow i.e. on 18.11.2022, as a fresh case.
By tomorrow morning, the respondents No. 1 and 3 will file an affidavit dealing with the salient points, as it is a medical college admission matter.”
7. Accordingly, the petition is placed today.
8. The State has filed its reply wherein at paragraph 4, 5, 6 and 7, it is stated as follows:
Court affirmed the importance of adhering to admission timelines and rejected jurisdiction under Article 226 for petitioner's procedural failures.
Timely submission of caste certificates is essential for eligibility in reservation, but unique case circumstances may allow leniency.
Adherence to the specified timeline for registration and admission process is crucial, and failure to register within the specified period cannot be excused.
The court cannot compel examination authorities to accept applications or fees after the official deadline, as such intervention disrupts established selection processes and undermines the integrity ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.