ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, SANJAY AGRAWAL
Surbhi Madaria D/o Vijay Lal Madaria – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Praveen Das, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Vikram Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents.
2. On the last occasion, when the case was listed on 09.11.2022, Mr. Gagan Tiwari, learned Deputy Government, appearing for the respondent had prayed for taking up this case today. Accordingly, the matter is listed today.
3. Mr. Vikram Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents submits that Mr. Tiwari is having some inconvenience to appear today and that he is appearing in this matter and is having full instructions.
4. The petitioner belongs to the other backward class (for short, the OBC) category. She being eligible for MBBS/BDS course, had applied online for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2022 (for short the NEET) examination. The petitioner obtained 465 out of 720 marks and her total percentile was assessed as 93.584030 with All India Rank at 112430.
5. The respondent No. 1 had framed a set of Rules, namely, Chhattisgarh Chikitsa, Dant Chikitsa Avam Bhautik Ch
The court established that candidates should be allowed to correct genuine mistakes in their application forms, particularly when such corrections do not disrupt the overall admission process and uph....
Court affirmed the importance of adhering to admission timelines and rejected jurisdiction under Article 226 for petitioner's procedural failures.
The Court emphasized that technicalities regarding caste certification should not deny admission to eligible candidates, supporting restitutionary justice for meritorious students.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.