Ganeshiya Bai vs Guruvindar Singh S/o Jaspal Singh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Chh) 102

SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Ganeshiya Bai – Appellant
Versus
Guruvindar Singh S/o Jaspal Singh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Rajendra Tripathi appears along with Shri R.L. Rajak, Advocate, Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Government Advocate

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition, the petitioners are questioning the legality and propriety of the order dated 23.10.2012 (Annexure P-1) passed in Revenue Case No. R.N./05/R/A-70/119/2011, whereby, the Board of Revenue, has dismissed the revision preferred by the petitioners while affirming the order dated 07.01.2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Raipur in Revenue Appeal Case No.279/A-70/2009-10 and accordingly, the application filed by respondent No.1- Guruvindar Singh under Section 116 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code, 1959’), has been allowed.

2. Briefly, stated the facts of the case are that the respondent No.1-Guruvindar Singh on the basis of an agreement to sale, dated 06.07.2005 (Annexure P-3), purported to have been executed in his favour by one Santosh Kumar, who is one of the co-owners of the land in question bearing Khasra No.225/1 admeasuring 7.59 acres situated at village Chorha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, moved an application on 22.01.2008 before the Court of Naib Tehsildar, Dhamdha for recording of his name in Kafiat column of Khasra Panchashala under Section 116 of the Code, 1959. The said application wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document