SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 138

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Charan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Bansal for petitioner;
Ms. Kritika Mohta for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred against the order dated 28.5.2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Bhopal Division District Bhopal in Appeal No.853/2017-18 whereby while allowing the appeal, order passed by SDO dated 9.3.2019 in first appeal No.853/2017-18 was set-aside wherein the order passed by Tehsildar dated 16.6.2017 in case NO.85/A-6-A/15-16 whereby the application for correction of entries in revenue records preferred by the present petitioner was rejected, set-aside.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner had argued before this Court that the order passed by the Additional Commissioner in the second appeal is per se illegal and dehors the provisions of deleted Section 116 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 wherein an entry made in the land records prepared under section 114 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 in respect of matters other than those referred to in section 108, could be corrected within one year of the date of such entry and for that the person is required to move an appropriate application before the Tehsildar for such correction within one year and only in those cases where corrections with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top