GOUTAM BHADURI, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Syed Irshad Ahmed Zaid, S/o. Shri Syed Muktar Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Shazia Anjum, D/o. Shri Itekar Mohammad Qureshi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Goutam Bhaduri, J.) :
1. This appeal is against the order dated 16.01.2023 and order dated 14.07.2022 passed by the Family Court, Rajnandgaon in Case No.59/2022, wherein, limited visitation right has been given to the father (appellant) to meet the child. In the initial order dated 14.07.2022, the Family Court has observed that the father can meet the child in the Meditation Centre situated at concerned District Court premises. Subsequently, another application was filed, wherein, it was prayed that the grandfather of the children, who is aged about 80 years, and is of ripened age, may also be allowed to meet the grandchildren, the said application too has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the order passed is not fruitful for the reason that the meeting of the child in the Court premises defeats the entire purpose. He submits that the grandfather of the children may also be allowed to meet the children and the order of visitation right may be modified accordingly until the custody battles are decided.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent opposes the submission made by counsel for the appellant and would submit that there is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.