IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJANI DUBEY, J.
Shirin Kawar W/o Mulchand Kawar – Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 2586 of 2016
Decided On : 23-11-2023
Caste Certificate - Termination of Services - CG Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - CG Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 - MP Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog Adhiniyam, 1995 - [Section 9 of MP Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog Adhiniyam, 1995, CG Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966, CG Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013] - The court discussed the validity of the caste certificate and the jurisdiction of the CG State Tribe Commission and the High Power Certificate Scrutiny Committee in conducting an enquiry into the verification of caste certificate. It emphasized the presumption of validity of caste certificate until cancelled by the competent authority and the requirement for verification to be done only by the Caste Scrutiny Committee.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was terminated from services based on an enquiry report that found the petitioner had obtained government job on the basis of a forged caste certificate. The petitioner's legal heirs sought to quash the termination order and requested verification of the caste certificate.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination order was based on an enquiry conducted by an authority that did not have jurisdiction to verify the validity of the caste certificate. It held that the verification should have been done only by the Caste Scrutiny Committee and set aside the termination order.
Issues: Validity of termination based on forged caste certificate, jurisdiction of the CG State Tribe Commission, entitlement to backwages and other benefits for legal heirs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the verification of validity of caste certificate and determination of caste status should be done only by the Caste Scrutiny Committee constituted in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The impugned termination order was set aside, and the legal heirs were held entitled to consequential monetary benefits except backwages. The matter was directed to be referred to the appropriate Caste Scrutiny Committee for verification of the caste certificate and determination of caste status.
ORDER :
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner Mulchand Kawar challenging the order dated 31.5.2016 passed by respondent No. 3 terminating his services on the ground of submission of forged caste certificate; the enquiry report dated 17.11.2015 and the order dated 22.12.2015 of CG State Scheduled Tribe Commission recommending termination of petitioner’s services (Annexure P/1).
2. Brief facts of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, are that the petitioner Mulchand Kawar was appointed on 12.11.1987 on the post of UDT and at the time of termination, he was holding the post of Principal, Govt. School, Khediago, Block Division Pithora, District Mahasamund. Upon a complaint made by one Lav Kumar on 19.8.2015 against the petitioner that he has obtained government job on the basis of fake caste certificate, an enquiry was conducted into the matter by Sub Divisional Officer, Renenue, Pithoura. In his enquiry report, the SDO held that the petitioner has forged his caste certificate as in the Missal record of his ancestors, his caste is shown as Christianity.
Based on the said enquiry report, CG Scheduled Tribe Commission vide impugned order dated 22.12.2015 directed respondent No. 1 to take action against the petitioner and consequently, vide impugned order dated 31.5.2016 respondent No. 3/DEO, Mahasamund terminated the services of the petitioner under Clause 10(9) of CG Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 with immediate effect. This petition was filed by the original petitioner Mulchand Kawar for the following relief:
(II) May kindly be pleased to direct the authorities to verify the caste certificate of the petitioner before reaching to a conclusion about petitioner’s cast.
(III) Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems, fit in the facts and circumstances may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.”
During pendency of this petition, the petitioner Mulchand Kawar passed away on 8.11.2020 and to carry forward the instant litigation, his legal heirs filed an application (IA No. 05/2021) which was allowed by this Court vide order dated 6.1.2022 and accordingly, the present petitioners were brought on record for contesting this petition. The petitioners pray that after termination of the impugned orders, they be given the benefit of pay, salary and allowances and other retiral dues of the deceased petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that CG State Tribe Commission was enacted under the provisions of MP Rajya Anusuchit Janjati Ayog Adhiniyam, 1995 and as per Section 9 of the said Act, no such power or authority has been vested upon the said Commission to look into validity and legality of the caste certificates. In fact, as per CG Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 it is only High Power Certificate Scrutiny Committee which is empowered to conduct an enquiry into the verification of caste certificate and pass orders on the validity of the caste certificate. It is a settled law that there is a presumption of validity of caste certificate unless and until such caste certificate is cancelled by the competent authority.
It is contended that the impugned termination order dated 31.5.2016 has been passed on the basis of order dated 22.12.2015 passed by CG Scheduled Tribe Commission which has no jurisdiction or authority to enquire into the validity of the caste certificate and as such, the very foundation of passing the impugned order itself is illegal and therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in law and it’s a nullity itself. When termination is found to be bad in law, back-wages and other pecuniary benefits and consequential benefits have to be granted. Since origina
Bharati Reddy vs. State of Karnataka
Collector, Bilaspur vs. Ajit P.K. Jogi and Others
Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Coal India Ltd. vs. Ananta Saha
Chief Engineer, Hydel Project and Others vs. Ravinder Nath and Others
Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India vs. Jagdish Balaram Bahira and Others
Kumari Madhuri Patil and Another vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and Others
Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
The verification of validity of caste certificate and determination of caste status should be done only by the Caste Scrutiny Committee constituted in accordance with the law.
The judgment underscores the significance of prompt scrutiny of caste certificates and the impact of false certificates on genuine candidates, emphasizing the need for swift resolution of caste-relat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of the petitioner's service despite the cancellation of her caste certificate, along with the limitation on claiming benefits as a S....
Verification of caste status is essential for appointments in reserved categories; reliance on a fraudulent certificate invalidates employment.
The court emphasized the protection of service benefits for appointments that have become final and considered the circumstances of caste certificate issuance to determine entitlement to benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between false certificate and forged certificate, and the application of relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to define....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.