SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, SANJAY AGRAWAL
Rajiv Katiyar, S/o Late Hridaya Kumar Katiyar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through the General Manager, SEC Railway – Respondent
ORDER :
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein has called in question legality, validity and correctness of the impugned order dated 11-8-2023 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Circuit Sitting at Bilaspur in Original Application No.203/00387/2020, by which the petitioner’s original application has been dismissed by the learned CAT finding no merit.
Question involved: -
2. The short question involved in the writ petition is, whether the petitioner herein can be proceeded departmentally by holding a departmental inquiry and a criminal trial on the same set of facts?
Factual backdrop: -
3. The aforesaid question arises on the following factual backdrop: -
4. While the petitioner was working as Senior Section Engineer (Safety) in South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, he was subjected to First Information Report (FIR) dated 18-9-2015 by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) under Sections 7 & 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1
State Bank of India and others v. Neelam Nag and another
Depot Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Mohd. Yousuf Miya and others
State of Rajasthan v. B.K. Meena
Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. and another
Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. M.G. Vittal Rao
State of Rajasthan Vs. B.K. Meena 8
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Others Vs. T. Srinivas (2004 (6) SCALE 467)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.