IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ., Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Sanjay Chargat S/o Nanka Kodaku - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer - Respondent
CRA No. 1255 of 2022
Decided On : 12-07-2024
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 6 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 363 and 366 - Conviction for kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor - The trial court convicted the appellant for kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault on a 5-year-old girl, sentencing him to life imprisonment under POCSO Act and concurrent sentences under IPC. (Paras 1, 2, 24)
(B) Age determination - The court emphasized the importance of determining the victim's age accurately, applying Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, which prioritizes documentary evidence for age verification. (Paras 10, 12)
(C) Evidence assessment - The court found the testimonies of the victim and her family credible, corroborated by medical evidence indicating sexual assault, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 24, 25)
Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 5-year-old girl, who returned home bleeding and in pain. The trial court relied on testimonies and medical evidence to convict the appellant.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the trial court's conviction, finding no legal or factual errors.
Issues: The main issues included the determination of the victim's age and the credibility of the evidence presented.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prosecution successfully proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the reliability of the victim's testimony and medical findings.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1. The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) questioning the impugned judgment dated 15.07.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO Act), Ramanujganj, District : Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) in Special Sessions Trial (POCSO) No.04/2022, whereby the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellant with a direction to run all the sentences concurrently, in the following manner :-
| CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| U/s 363 of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous imprisonment for 05years & fine of Rupees 5,000/- in default of fine R.I. for 01 month |
| U/s 366 of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous imprisonment for 05years & fine of Rupees 5,000/- in default of fine R.I. for 01 month |
| U/s 06 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 | Life imprisonment & fine of Rupees 50,000/- in default of fine R.I. for 02 months |
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on the morning of 28.01.2022, the victim aged 5 years (PW-8) had gone to play at the house of a neighbor in her village. At around 10.30, the victim came home crying. Father of the victim (PW-1) when asked the victim the reason for crying, the victim did not say anything. Thereafter the mother of the victim (PW-2) when asked the victim the reason for crying, the victim told that accused Sanjay Kodaku cheated her and took her to the forest and did wrong things. Thereafter, when the victim's mother lifted the victim's frock and saw, she found that blood was coming out from the victim's genitals and the genitals were swollen. Thereafter, on the evening of the said date, the victim's father lodged a written complaint (Ex.P-1) against the accused in Police Station Chalgali, District Balrampur (C.G.). On the basis of said written complaint, First Information Report under crime number 05/2022 was registered by Police Station Chalgali under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act (for short ‘POCSO Act’).
3. Assistant Sub Inspector of Police Station Chalgali, Sebresius Tirkey (PW-7) inspected the scene of the incident on the date of the incident itself as per the information given by the victim's father and prepared a visual map vide Ex.P-3 and recorded the statements of the applicant/victim's father and other witnesses. During the course investigation of the case, Sub Inspector Sunil Tiwari (PW-11) after receiving consent from victim's parents vide Ex.P-11 sent the victim to Balrampur District Hospital for genital examination. Underwear of accused was seized vide seizure sheet Ex.P-11A and the victim's vaginal discharge and oral swab, frock and others were seized vide seizure sheet Ex.P-12. Record of Anganwadi center regarding the date of birth of the victim was seized vide Ex.P-6. Thereafter, statement of the victim was recorded by lady police officer Inspector Anita Prabha Minj (PW-10). The statement of the victim was got recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Investigation Officer Sunil Tiwari and the accused was arrested. For D.N.A. testing, the identity cards of the victim and the accused were prepared vide Ex.P-22 and Ex.P-23 respectively and consent was taken from the victim's father vide Ex.P-24 and consent from accused was obtained vide Ex.P-25. A letter was sent to District Hospital, Balrampur for collecting blood sample for DNA testing of the victim and the accused vide Ex.P-17. Blood samples of the victim and accused were seized by Dr. Surendra Gupta vide Ex.P-9 and Ex.P-10 respectively. The said blood samples were sent to FSL, Raipur through Superintendent of Police Balrampur for DNS analysis.
4. After receiving DNA report vide Ex.P-21, other statutory formalities related to research were completed and charge sheet was submitted against the accused under Section 6 of
The court affirmed the conviction for kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the importance of age determination and the reliability of victim testimony supported by medical evidence.
Conviction and sentencing for sexual offences under the POCSO Act upheld, establishing that the defense's failure to challenge the victim's age and credibility supported the prosecution's case.
Point of Law : Prosecution has failed to prove beyond doubt that the victim was below 18 years of age as on the date of the incident. Under these circumstances, the accused cannot be held guilty of o....
It stands well settled that circumstances not put to an accused under Section 313 Cr.PC. cannot be used against him and must be excluded from consideration - In a criminal trial, importance of questi....
The conviction of the appellant for sexual assault on a minor was upheld based on credible victim testimony and proper age determination under the POCSO Act.
Penetrative sexual assault upon minor girl – It is incumbent upon prosecution to establish beyond all reasonable doubts that victim was below 18 years as on date of occurrence to attract provisions o....
The court affirmed that a victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.