IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, JJ.
Jaswant Dewar, S/o Shatruhan Dewar - Appellants
Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh, through: Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Pulgaon, District Durg (C.G.) - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 1415 Of 2015
Decided On : 27-03-2024
Criminal Appeal - Conviction under Sections 382, 460 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code - [382, 460, 302/34] - The court affirmed the finding that the death of the deceased was homicidal in nature and analyzed the incriminating circumstances to conclude that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted for offenses under Sections 382, 460 & 302/34 of IPC for trespass, causing death, and theft. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the death of the deceased to be homicidal but concluded that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Issues: The key issue was whether the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish the guilt of the appellants beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of circumstantial evidence and emphasized the need for conclusive and consistent evidence to exclude any other hypothesis except guilt.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence of the appellants were set aside. They were acquitted on the basis of the benefit of doubt.
JUDGMENT ON BOARD
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. The present Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’) has been preferred by the three Appellants herein i.e., A-1 Jaswant Dewar, A-2 Rajkumar Pal and A-3 Ajuba Dewar, assailing Judgment & Order dated 16.10.2015 passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Durg (in short ‘Trial Court’) in Sessions Case No.190/2014, by which each of them has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 382, 460 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and sentenced as under:-
| Conviction | Sentence |
| 1. Under Section 382 of IPC. | 1. Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years. 2. Fine of Rs.250/- 3. In default of payment of fine, to undergo additional Six months’ Rigorous Imprisonment. |
| 2. Under Section 460 of IPC. | 1. Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years. 2. Fine of Rs.250/- 3. In default of payment of fine, to undergo additional Six months’ Rigorous Imprisonment. |
| 3. Under Section 302/34 of IPC. | 1. Rigorous Imprisonment for Life. 2. Fine of Rs.250/- 3. In default of payment of fine, to undergo additional Six months’ Rigorous Imprisonment. |
| All substantive Sentences have been directed to run concurrently. | |
Facts of the case, in brief:
2. The three Appellants herein were tried before the Trial Court for the aforesaid offences under Sections 382, 460 & 302/34 of IPC on the charges that on 1.8.2014 at about 12 O’clock in the midnight, in furtherance of their common intention, they committed trespass by entering into an under construction Maruti showroom situated at bypass road, Khapri Khar, Anjora within the jurisdiction of Police Station Pulgaon and in the course of which, caused death of two guards, Bahur Singh Thakur and Ashwani Kumar Dewangan, who were on their night duty at the said Maruti showroom, by use of hammer and iron jointer and thereafter stole iron jointers, aluminum strips etc., total amounting to Rs.20,000/-, thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
3. The matter was reported by PW-1 Hariram Sinha, who also said to have been working as a guard in the said under construction Maruti showroom. According to him, on 2.8.2014, he attended his duty at 7:00 am and during the course of his duty when he reached at the spot, he found ensanguined dead-bodies of two guards, Bahur Singh Thakur and Ashwani Kumar Dewangan, lying there covered with pant, shirt and bicycle. He informed the incident to PW-2 Bhupendra Singh Thakur (PW-2), son of deceased Bahur Singh Thakur, who came to the spot and identified the dead body of his father and then the matter was reported to the police. Dehati Nalishi was prepared by Exhibit P-1 and Sketch Map of the occurrence site was prepared vide Exhibit P-28. Dehati Merg Intimations were recorded vide Exhibits P-2 & P-3 in respect of deceased Bahur Singh Thakur and Ashwani Kumar Dewangan and sent to Police Station Pulgaon where Merg Intimations were recorded vide Exhibits P-44 & P-45 and FIR was registered vide Exhibit P-12. Witnesses were summoned vide Exhibit P-24 and Inquest Panchnama was prepared vide Exhibit P-25. Vide Exhibit P-26, blood-soaked & plain soil and bicycle were seized from the place of incident. Similarly, vide Exhibit P-29, torches, an iron jointer, shawls etc., were recovered from the spot.
4. Dead-bodies of two deceased persons were subjected to post-mortem. PW-16 Dr. B.N. Dewangan, conducted post-mortem examination of deceased Ashwani Kumar Dewangan vide Exhibit P-15(A) and opined his cause of death to be due to ante-mortem head injuries and the nature of death to be homicidal. Similarly, PW-14 Dr. R.K. Nayak conducted post-mortem examination of deceased Bahur Singh Thakur vide Exhibit P-51(B) in which his cause of death has been opined to be shock due to extensive head and visceral injur
Balwan Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Hari Om alias Hero v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan
The judgment emphasizes the requirement for circumstantial evidence to be conclusive and consistent to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; reliance on circumstantial evidence without corroboration can lead to acquittal.
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of evidence, including motive, in cases based on circumstantial evidence, and the evidence must be cogent, trustworthy, and exclude every possible hypo....
Circumstantial evidence can lead to conviction in murder cases if it forms a complete narrative excluding reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.