SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 318

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 
Gurvinder Singh Gill and Jasjit Singh Bedi, JJ.
Gurpal Singh And Another – Appellant 
Versus 
State Of Punjab – Respondent 
CRA-D-190-DB-2005 (O&M) and CRR-2260-2007 (O&M)
Decided on : 15-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Jasdev Singh Brar, Advocate with Mr. Inderjeet Singh Brar, Advocate, Mr. H.S.Randhawa, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Mr. Arav Gupta, Amicus Curiae, Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Circumstantial evidence can lead to conviction in murder cases if it forms a complete narrative excluding reasonable doubt.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 460 - Murder and robbery - Appellants convicted for the murder of two individuals based on circumstantial evidence, including extra judicial confession and matching of finger prints - Court reaffirmed the need for complete chain of evidence in circumstantial cases. (Paras 23-35)

(B) Appeal dismissed due to lack of merit; revision petition for sentence enhancement denied as not meeting 'rarest of rare' criteria. (Paras 36-38)

Facts of the case:
The incident involved the murder of Mohinder Singh and D.C. Singh, with a history of circumstantial evidence and extra judicial admissions leading to a conviction.

Findings of Court:
The evidence corroborated the prosecution's case, primarily through expert testimony and forensic analysis.

Issues: The key issue revolved around the sufficiency and credibility of circumstantial evidence while establishing guilt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that circumstantial evidence can be conclusive if it establishes a complete narrative of guilt, with specific emphasis on fingerprint analysis.

Result: Appeal dismissed, revision petition for enhancement also dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to conviction based on appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments challenging the reliability of circumstantial evidence. (Para 16 , 18)
3. court's scrutiny of circumstantial evidence supporting conviction. (Para 24 , 30 , 34)
4. legal standards for circumstantial evidence. (Para 35)
5. outcome of appeal and revision petition. (Para 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT :

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

This judgment shall dispose off the above mentioned appeal filed by appellants Gurpal Singh and Malkiat Singh @ Lambu challenging their conviction and also a revision petition filed by Jora Singh (father of deceased Mohinder Singh) who seeks enhancement of sentence. Vide judgment dated 02.02.2005 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda, the appellants Gurpal Singh and Malkiat Singh @ Lambu have been held guilty and sentenced as under:-

Section

Sentence

302 IPC for committing the murder of Mohinder Singh

Imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000 and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months

302 for committing the murder of D.C.Singh

Imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000 and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months

2. Since the proceedings qua appellant No.1-Gurpal Singh already stand abated, the appeal survives qua appellant No.2-Malkiat Singh only.

3. The matter relates to death of two persons namely Mohinder Singh and D.C. Singh, in respect of which FIR No.49, dated 25.05.2002, was lodged at Police Station Talwandi Sabo, Bathinda, under Sections 302 and 460 IPC (Ex.PJ/2) on the statement (Ex.PJ) of complainant Pirthi Singh, wherein it is alleged that he was employed as a tractor driver with Narinder Singh. It is alleged that Mohinder Singh (deceased No.1) was serving as a cook whereas D.C. Singh (deceased No.2) was looking after cattle of Narinder Singh. About 7/8 days earlier Narinder Singh had gone to Delhi and that on the previous night (24.5.2002) at about 7:30 PM, he went home after winding up his work. Mohinder Singh and D.C.Singh were sleeping outside for the purpose of security of the house. Next morning at about 7:00 AM, when he went to the house of Narinder Singh, he saw that Mohinder Singh and D.C.Singh had been tied to cots with the help of 'parna' (piece of cloth) and they were having injuries on their heads. Complainant stated that it appeared that the said two had been strangulated to death with 'parna' and had also been inflicted injuries during the night intervening 24/25.02.2002 by some unknown persons.

4. Pursuant to lodging of the FIR, the Investigating Officer SI Mukhtiar Singh (PW-13) along with other police officials went to the spot. Inquest proceedings were conducted in respect of both the dead bodies namely Mohinder Singh and D.C.Singh vide memo Ex.PF and Ex.PC respectively. The spot was got photographed. The dead bodies were sent for post mortem examination vide memo Ex.PB and Ex.PE. Rough site plan of place of occurrence was prepared vide memo Ex.PX. Blood stained soil was collected from the spot and was sealed vide memo Ex.PN. A broken piece of stick was also taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex.PP. Two pairs of shoes, a 'parna' and blood stained shirt were also taken into possession. Foot moulds in respect of foot prints were got prepared and taken into possession vide memo Ex.PQ. Statement of witnesses were recorded in terms of Section 161 Cr.P.C.

5. It is further the case of prosecution that Investigating Officer SI Mukhtiar Singh (PW-13) again visited the spot the next day i.e. on 26.5.2002 along with finger print expert Prabh Dayal and finger prints were lifted from almirah and from the photo frame. It is further the case of prosecution that on 27.5.2002 he had again visited the spot and that Shamsher Singh had disclosed to him that two empty glasses and a liquor bottle were lying in the cattle shed and that the said bottle and glasses were duly sealed and taken into poss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top